Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Education is the most essential part of a student's life. It helps in the overall development of the student. The resources should be adequate enough so that student's get the best education wherever they study. However, I disagree with the statement that to improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries of professors.
In my opinion, money should be divided equally among each resource required to improve the quality of education. The staff in the university plays an important role. From the administrative department to teaching staff, every person deserves equal money since all are working towards shaping future of the students in one way or the other. For example, an admin staff is responsible to provide fees, hostel, degree, transcripts etc related help to students and the teaching professors are the ones which shapes the career of the student by teaching them in best possible ways. Therefore, every person at universities contributes to improving the quality of education as students rely on different resources for different queries.
Another important part of any university is its library. Books are every student's priority since whatever they are taught in class, they definitely run to the library to get more information regarding topics discussed in class. It is one such resource which needs proper funds to remain up to date. Therefore, money spent on providing the best updated library resources is also an important aspect of improving the quality of education.
To further support my opinion, money should also be spent on purchasing the latest equipment required in various technical departments of the universities. This will allow students to improvise in their technical skills based on the latest advancements and stay up to date with current equipment and facilities. Therefore, based on these reasons I suggest that universities should spend money on all important resources rather on salaries of professors alone, to improve the quality of education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'get the best'.
Suggestion: get the best
...uld be adequate enough so that students get best education wherever they study. However,...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 280, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , universities
...that to improve the quality of education,universities should spend money on salaries of profe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to equal'
Suggestion: to equal
...o teaching staff, every person deserves equal money since all are working towards sha...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 543, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the best'.
Suggestion: in the best
... the career of student by teaching them in best possible ways. Therefore, every person ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 74, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...versity is its library. Books are every students priority since whatever they are taught...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 370, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g best updated library resources is also important aspect in improving quality of...
^^
Line 7, column 62, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'purchasing the latest'.
Suggestion: purchasing the latest
... opinion, money should also be spent in purchasing latest equipment required in various technical...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 304.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49013157895 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9875068093 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539473684211 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1117630568 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.3125 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25929413048 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991605645527 0.076458572812 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143787258577 0.0737576698707 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172959170473 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703685100505 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 58.1214874552 61% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.