Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
No one can cast a shadow of doubt on the importance of the role that financial support plays in the life of people. There is a hot debate on the relationship between the increasing of the saliries of the professors and improvements of the education. Although some may believe that educational matters are von related to the monetary aspects, However, I feel quite opposite. In my perspective adequate salary would result in the prosperous educational system, since professors would have more time to dedicate to academic matters, they would mentaly satisfied, and the could better support students financially.
First and fore most, It is crystal clear that most of the academic staff would like to do part time jobes related to their profeesion to gain more money. By improvements in the salary payment, they would find more time to work with students, because they do not worry about financial matters.
Second, enhancemet in the salaries would provide more mental relief for academic members. They can spend extra money on the travel for instance. After having a good weekend they would be more satisfied mentally, so they can start a new working week with enourmos energy and interest. An academic survey illustrates that professors who are mentally in great codition, could contribute more eduacationaly.
Last but not least, improvement of the salary would result in more support of the students. in most group projects students need to have monetary support for their equpments, which are necessary for experiments. Professors, who have big grants, could solve this issue easily. Since they are aware of the students' problem.
For the matter of the coclution,considering the mentioned reasons, I think it is evident that helping academic staff financially, would lead to flourishing system of educatoin. Eventhough, it was just a story in a nutshell, and there are other reasons for improvements of education in this case. Groving the amounts of payments not only improve the mental health of the professors, but also prove opportunities to the professors to help studens as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 91, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
... of the academic staff would like to do part time jobes related to their profeesion to ga...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 93, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...result in more support of the students. in most group projects students need to ha...
^^
Line 13, column 277, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... grants, could solve this issue easily. Since they are aware of the students problem....
^^^^^
Line 13, column 305, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...sue easily. Since they are aware of the students problem. For the matter of the coc...
^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 32, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , considering
...em. For the matter of the coclution,considering the mentioned reasons, I think it is ev...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, well, for instance, i feel, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1773.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 338.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24556213018 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92950805364 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559171597633 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3068736812 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.294117647 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8823529412 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88235294118 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176595749853 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610401150674 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443421077034 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104367881756 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032153125849 0.0645574589148 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.