Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
By and large, the avenues of communication have been broaden in the modern society which we live in, comparing to past. Expansion of world wide networks like internet have played an important role in promoting new ways for communication. There is a plethora of people who are in the conviction that using these new technological advancements, Emails to be more specific, are more efficient comparing to in person comminutions for people, others take a radically different point of view and disagree. To the extent that y personal perspective is concerned, I accord with the first group. Among countless reasons which give adherence to my opinion, I will delve into the most conspicuous ones in what follows.
Firstly, sending emails prepares the bed for more professionalism, more structural approaches. Enabling coworkers or students to have a copy of discussed points, E-mail helps to avoid any kinds of possible forgetness. These evidence come handy, especially when people start to accuse each other on any fault that the final outcome of projects may carry. Take my cousin as an example of the troubles one may face, in the absence of hard evidence. He and his colleagues were on the edge of a deadline to hand in the final outlines, and sending E-mails just seemed preposterous to them, since they were literally in a meter distance with each other in the office and sending communication in person seemed much faster. Two hours to the deadline, their boss found out a catastrophic deficiency in the outline. Not only didn't anybody take the responsibility, but also they blamed each other for the problem. Finally, my cousin whom couldn't prove his innocence was introduced as guilty. In the end it doesn't matter if one is guilty or not, but if he has the evidence to prove it.
Secondly, the magic of E-mails have enabled us to properly communicate 24 hours a day. One may be unable to meet his colleagues or classmates in person, but he always has a chance to communicate with them through E-mail, and by the way wasn't this the main point of developing these kinds of services, in the first place? Barely, did I had a chance to meet with my classmates during spring breaks, for example. But the projects had to be done anyway. Although after the breaks we met on regular bases, but were we to be dependent only on our meetings we wouldn't have been able to meet the deadlines.
In short, all the aforementioned reasons and examples leads to the conclusion that it's much ore beneficial to use emails instead of in person meetings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'broadened'.
Suggestion: broadened
... the avenues of communication have been broaden in the modern society which we live in,...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
...ive in, comparing to past. Expansion of world wide networks like internet have played an i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
...ive in, comparing to past. Expansion of world wide networks like internet have played an i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 816, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...hic deficiency in the outline. Not only didnt anybody take the responsibility, but al...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 928, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...or the problem. Finally, my cousin whom couldnt prove his innocence was introduced as g...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 996, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...was introduced as guilty. In the end it doesnt matter if one is guilty or not, but if ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 237, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...ith them through E-mail, and by the way wasnt this the main point of developing these...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 554, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...to be dependent only on our meetings we wouldnt have been able to meet the deadlines. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 153, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e emails instead of in person meetings.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, in short, by and large, by the way, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2116.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 435.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86436781609 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82654499099 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570114942529 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 673.2 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9084927201 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.8 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18163200093 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480827914741 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363156984731 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105081018806 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199374686581 0.0645574589148 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.