Do you agree or disagree? People meet many problems in their daily life and they can solve them by themselves or with the help of their families, so the help from the government is not necessary.
Since the creation, man has been challenging with a lot of daily problems in his life. Most people wonder how they can resolve their daily problems efficiently. They wonder whether they and their relatives are enough to deal with all of their problems, which confront them or not. In my opinion, to solve a lot of problems we need help from the government and we can not solve them by ourselves or with the help of our family. It’s because only the government can help us to solve some kinds of our financial problems; moreover, we need help from some governmental services to deal with problems such as finding a theft. I will illustrate my reasons in the following paragraphs.
First of all, some financial problems can not solve with the help of our relatives. Indeed, they may have not enough money to lend us, especially when we need a considerable amount. In these cases, we can borrow money from the banks managing by the government. For example, I remember when I wanted to buy a house, I visited a house meeting all of my needs. Although the house was exactly according to my criteria, I didn’t have enough money to buy it. In fact, my money was 10000 $ less than the house’s price. None of my relatives and friends didn’t have that money to lend me. One day, I was thinking about my problem when one of my friends called and suggested me to lend that money from a governmental bank that provided people with debts for buying their first house. When I went to that bank, I could borrow my needed money easily. Consequently, my problem was solved with the help of the bank and I bought the house in turn. If I hadn’t borrowed that money from the bank, I couldn’t have bought the house, which was according to my criteria.
As the second reason, there are some special problems such as theft, murder, extinguishing a fire and so on that need specialists to solve them. For solving these kinds of problems which we may face, we have to get help from a governmental service such as the police or fire department. For example, consider your car is stolen. Obviously, you can not solve the problem and find the thief by calling your friends or families. Actually, the wisely response in this predicament is calling to police and make them aware of the theft. Consequently, they can help you to find your car and its thief through their experience and specialty. In fact, not having those appropriate experience and knowledge, we can not fix those problems by ourselves. Thus, we need the help of the government in these cases.
Based on the aforementioned reasons, it can be concluded that we can not deal with all of our daily problems without getting help from governmental services and facilities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: CURRENCY[2]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$10000'.
Suggestion: $10000
... money to buy it. In fact, my money was 10000 $ less than the house's price. None ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 555, Rule ID: HELP_TO_FIND[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'help you find' instead.
Suggestion: help you find
...re of the theft. Consequently, they can help you to find your car and its thief through their ex...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, consequently, first, if, may, moreover, second, so, thus, for example, in fact, such as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 78.0 43.0788530466 181% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2262.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 480.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7125 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68069463864 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71174084486 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.425 0.524837075471 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 676.8 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3184256115 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4615384615 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340059630476 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104047466511 0.076458572812 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0901366809387 0.0737576698707 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242398028288 0.150856017488 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108427355885 0.0645574589148 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.