Do you agree or disagree?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve internet access than to public transportation.
The governor is responsible for providing the proper condition for his citizens. The allocation of importance to the different civic occupation varies according to the demands of society. At this prompt, the author asserts that governments should give more emphasis to the internet connection rather than public transportation. This is the claim with which I generally do not concur. Among the countless reasons which give adherence to my viewpoint, I would list the most conspicuous ones in what follows.
The first striking reason which should be considered is the impact factor of public transportation. Indeed, while the few people have access to the internet; lots of persons use public transportation. This fact is also verified by a noteworthy study conducted in the Sociology Department of the Tehran University in Iran. According to this intelligent research, approximate seventy-five percent of denizens in Iran use the public transportation system; meanwhile, merely thirty-five percent of people in Iran have access to the internet. In this condition, it is a sound option to give weight to the most popular item such as public transportation to satisfy the majority; rather than focusing on the small portion's demand.
Another equally crucial reason which should be highlighted here is the environmental issue. In another word, there is the enhancement of the environmental condition by the usage efficient type of transportation. It is obvious that transportation has a vital role in air pollution, by consideration of sustainable system, it can be handled effectively. A lucid example which could shed the spotlight on the issue is the alteration of the transportation system of Tabriz in the last decade. Previously, buses in Tabriz were belonged to fifty years ago, while produces 300cc CO2 pre-one-kilometer displacement, with the change of the buses in the last decade, this amount is halved. This is the one instance of a proper transportation system in the environment; and it has further impacts, which lead to a healthy and sustainable environment. Thus, it is important to focus on transportation rather than the internet.
However, some people may believe that the internet also possesses a vital role in society which should not be neglected by the governor. Although this is the sound perspective, this group, in fact, underestimates a subtle fact which by the allocation of attention to the public voyage, the internet, and network access will not be ignored by leaders. As mentioned, each governor is responsible for various duties and focusing on one issue should not be considered as the ignorance of others. Otherwise, the governor will face failure during his leadership.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons and facts explicitly illustrate that the governor should weigh the public transportation rather than the internet. Since it covers a wider range of people, it has a greater impact on society. Moreover, focusing on transportation should not be evaluated as the underestimation of the internet, since the governor is responsible for entire requirements.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st conspicuous ones in what follows. The first striking reason which should b...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cusing on the small portions demand. Another equally crucial reason which sho...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nsportation rather than the internet. However, some people may believe that th...
^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... face failure during his leadership. To wrap it up, all the aforementioned re...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, while, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 33.0 8.0752688172 409% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2627.0 1977.66487455 133% => OK
No of words: 488.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38319672131 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28788668772 2.67179642975 123% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479508196721 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 819.0 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9542059674 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.458333333 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.08333333333 5.45110844103 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182980852941 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557776583335 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619716697243 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112482960237 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532456882215 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 86.8835125448 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.