get the news online or by newspaprer
News has an influential and tremendous impact on our lives. In fact, it is vitally important to follow it and stay updated with it in order for the best results to follow suits, it helps to enrich people' minds about a verity of information that happens around the world. Moreover, there are many resources we can rely on to read it but the leap of the informational technology that happens within the contemporary era which has a spectacular breakthrough many spheres, it leads many people to switch from reading the news by using the newspapers to the use of the internet. However, I personally prefer to use the traditional type rather than the modern one due to the cons of using the internet. The following explanations go as follows.
To begin with, many new innovations such as the computers lead to much adverse health effects. So, people should try to avoid using them only in need. Indeed, these gadgets emit electromagnetic radiation that will reflect negatively on individual's health. For instance, constant exposure to radioactive waves from these devices will lead to trigger many developmental abnormalities that might affect the offspring surrounding them while they are reading. In addition, being in front a small screen will cause many visual issues because they will strain their eye-grazing while they are focusing on a small subject. In contrast, using the newspaper has no side effect. Consequently, in order to have optimal welfare, it is crucial to carve out the information we need by using a non-harmful source such as the newspapers.
Second, dwellers should not grasp the news by browsing through the large net webs because this will lead to many bad implications for their career. In fact, using these new smart devices will cause a tremendous distraction if they will tempt to employ them at an inappropriate time. For example, sometimes, I used to search about the new news of the day while I am at the workplace, and after that without paying attention to my work-time, I started to check my social media such as the facebook and twitter. In addition, I sent many personal emails that did not relate to my tasks, then, I just realized that the time went in a split of second and I still, did not finish my work in an orderly and timely fashion and this reflects negatively on my workflow and productivity. Furthermore, this created a bad impression on me from my supervisor. In contrary, if I bought a newspaper and read it at the end of the day when I had leisure time, all that would not happen. In conclusion, it is critical to use the newspaper rather than the internet because this will have a bad impact on our work outcome.
To sum up, I can not oversee that the online search has many pros but its cons overweigh the advantages. Hopefully, all inhabitant will harvest the news they need without using the internet because it may lead to many obstacles in their future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...diation that will reflect negatively on individuals health. For instance, constant exposure...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, still, then, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2415.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 503.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80119284294 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79130346082 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508946322068 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 746.1 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.0034341385 48.9658058833 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9523809524 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.90476190476 5.45110844103 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0571969500585 0.236089414692 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0192528755719 0.076458572812 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0324055519095 0.0737576698707 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0474577747585 0.150856017488 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378459086854 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.002688172 185% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.