Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams.
As we know, the arts and sport both are the targets of people pursuing. People without an aesthetic perspective can't absorb the real meaning of great works. Similarly, people without a healthy body also lose the potential of achieving dreams. So, someone thinks it is better for the university to spend more money on athletics than on aesthetics. From the point of view, I insist that investing in the arts is a better choice.
First of all, considering the chance of touching the great works is rare, the university should hold aesthetic events to arise the potential passion toward the arts of everyone. Actually, this kind of event will build an elegant atmosphere for students to learn and digest the wisdom of art. people could come easily, then enjoy the artifacts displayed, and discuss the background of the work. They immerse themselves in the world of art. In other words, it enhances their art appreciation ability.
In addition, it offers students a new place to relax. There are more and more things that need to be done for students when they step into the university. Studies show that almost eighty percent of undergraduates are suffering over anxiety due to endless assignments. Therefore, it is obvious that participating in the event could reduce this negative feeling.
Even though the university should spend more money on the arts, it doesn't mean the sports have nothing. Those sports are also accessible entertainments of relaxing themselves. Furthermore, the university will become more famous if the athletics win prizes, especially for Olympic game.
To sum up, considering the significance of the arts, it is undoubted that the university should spend more money on it. With the assistance of money, the organization of art could do more things to spread the benefits of knowing about the arts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...People without an aesthetic perspective cant absorb the real meaning of great works....
^^^^
Line 3, column 293, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
... to learn and digest the wisdom of art. people could come easily, then enjoy the artif...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 68, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...should spend more money on the arts, it doesnt mean the sports have nothing. Those spo...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, furthermore, if, similarly, so, then, therefore, in addition, kind of, first of all, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 301.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09302325581 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75314474055 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578073089701 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.4118712724 48.9658058833 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.6842105263 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8421052632 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208886897818 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589400997476 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633996213091 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116831964908 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522601770058 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.