If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying
If people want to improve their life, they should forget the fast access affair. It is obvious that special things never be accessible in a short time and a particular opportunity never reach easily. Quick decisions sometimes may lead you to wrong way. I think the best affair never reach quickly. The ensuring paragraph will elaborate on this claim. To begin with, quick decision doesn’t allow the man to think enough and investigate the affair that proposed to him. In this way, people may choose a job that they don’t have any apt to do it. If they think enough and study in the field of their proposed job, they will be successful in it. In addition, I think the most important criterion in taking the job is leaning. If you are interested in the job that you have, you will be successful in it and the time that you spending doing your job will be interesting. People never be tired if they do the job that they interested in. if the first job that offered to you may be your favourite position, then you could choose it as soon as possible, of course, it rarely happens. In conclusion, it is my opinion that waiting for a career that you like is better than choose the first opportunity that suggested to you. If you hold on, you may take better job. It is noticeable that a quick decision may not be the best intent. It is noticeable that to choose your favourit job you must spend a lot of time to found it. This is why I suggested that waiting for a good position is so remarkable.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, so, then, i think, in addition, in conclusion, of course, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 52.1666666667 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1218.0 1977.66487455 62% => OK
No of words: 277.0 407.700716846 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.39711191336 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44086574681 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 212.727598566 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.472924187726 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 375.3 618.680645161 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.2892326493 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.6470588235 100.406767564 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2941176471 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11764705882 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.53405017921 22% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260731357929 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897141016321 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681927350751 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260731357929 0.150856017488 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.4 11.7677419355 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.94 10.9000537634 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.71 8.01818996416 84% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 86.8835125448 46% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.