Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
— Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
— Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader.
— Say nothing.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Mistakes are inevitable, and no one is perfect. We all made mistakes, it's in our nature as humans to fail, whether it's in our work environment, our family life, or our relationships. Sometimes in the classroom, teachers make unintentional mistakes and confront student reactions. Some students immediately interrupt and correct the error; others may wait until the end of class then talk to the teacher about a mistake that happens, also sometimes they say nothing. I, myself, agree with the earliest statement for following compelling reasons.
The main reason behind that is an interruption, and correction right away will prevent other students from learning the wrong things. It's evident after you correct your teacher, it causes other students to pay attention to your opinion about the wrong things. Also, it may remove doubts in students who are dubious for things that the teacher is saying. For example, in computer architecture course if the teacher had done binary summation wrongly, it would have awkward result in following steps, when someone corrects teacher immediately it prevent other students misunderstanding and doubt. Therefore, in this situation, when a teacher makes a mistake, the best thing to do is correcting a teacher because it avoids misperception.
Secondly, it may cause the teacher to be grateful for your paying attention. A deliberate mistake is what most teachers do to find whether students pay attention or not. So, when you instantly interpose the teacher and amend the error, it's obvious you concentrate in class also study well at home. Then the teacher might ask you more in future courses. Also, a teacher could give you a chance to be teaching assistants for resolving other student's problems. For example, in Algebra class, when I mentioned to a mistake that was made by my teacher, he was surprised and assigned me as a teacher assistant for this course. Therefore, this is essential to mentioned teacher mistakes instantly because it may make intentionally as teacher's strategies.
To sum up, it would be better to interrupt and correct the teacher immediately because it prevents further misunderstanding; also, it reveals you study meticulously and may cause a teacher creates excellent opportunities for you.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...o one is perfect. We all made mistakes, its in our nature as humans to fail, whethe...
^^^
Line 5, column 544, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'prevents'?
Suggestion: prevents
...someone corrects teacher immediately it prevent other students misunderstanding and dou...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, for example, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1913.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 362.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28453038674 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96528786881 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544198895028 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7742309229 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.277777778 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250340771947 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873927500275 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457984139052 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156340573372 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027721716342 0.0645574589148 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.