Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do? 1. Interrupt and correct the mistake right away; 2. Wait until the class or the meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or the meeting leader; 3. Say nothing
People have always tried to avoid themselves from the mistakes to show others that they do not have problems in life. But, in some cases, leader of a company or the teacher of a class will say something wrong that we can understand it, and our habit in this situation is so important. That is a controversial issue which people talk to each other to know about that which reaction is true. In my opinion, waiting until the class or the meeting finishes and correct it after that is better than other ideas. In the following paragraphs, I will explore into the most conspicuous reasons and examples justifying my viewpoint.
To begin with, the teacher's mistake will solve privately. Everyone especially a teacher or a boss of a company has a specific prestige among others. Interrupting and correct his or her mistake between the speeches is a detrimental decision, because with this reaction from us, his or her value will reduce and anyone cannot trust to his or her words. Consequently, talking to them in private is an efficient solution for this matter. My own experience as a student demonstrates evidence of this. When I was in high school, I took a Geography class. I had an enormous information from variety countries in the world because that was my interest. After a while, my teacher began to talk about African countries. He told a wrong data in the class, and that was a crucial moment tin the class that I had to decide to interrupt and correct or wait until the class finished. I waited and after the time of the class, I said to my teacher that he had an incorrect information about that topic. He appreciated me for my beautiful reaction.
Secondly, with interrupting into the conversation, people will stop the meeting for a moment and speakers will lost their word. This is bad circumstance that when someone is talking about something with lots of energy, suddenly, someone interrupt his speech. In this situation it can impact on that meeting, and even on listeners because their mind will deviate for a second. As a result, this habit can influence on the meeting which is constitution from speakers and listeners.
To sum up, waiting until the end of conversation is appropriate solution for this specific situation. Because of, first, we can keep the worth of the speakers among other people, second, we do not make a stop in the discussion and no one lose the topic.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: PRP_RB_NO_VB[1]
Message: Are you missing a verb?
... mistake will solve privately. Everyone especially a teacher or a boss of a company has a sp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'lose'
Suggestion: lose
... meeting for a moment and speakers will lost their word. This is bad circumstance th...
^^^^
Line 5, column 238, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'interrupts'.
Suggestion: interrupts
... with lots of energy, suddenly, someone interrupt his speech. In this situation it can im...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, second, secondly, so, while, talking about, as a result, in my opinion, in some cases, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1984.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 417.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75779376499 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73899756597 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491606714628 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 607.5 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6001166872 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1818181818 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9545454545 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.40909090909 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21445369465 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587295933014 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535084040431 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1227369241 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601395223764 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.