It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in on specific subject
nowadays, it is commonly accepted that widespread learning has many advantage contrary to this popular belief, there are still those who argue that focus in a specific topic is a very effective in the academic education. I, to a great extent, agree with idea that to have prevalent information in many academic subjects is a very useful for students.
First and foremost, nowadays interdisciplinary science is one of the indispensable science in high level of academic education. In fact, students who had broad knowledge of many academics topic, this students in the university education works effectively. For clear instance, the Bio-Technology engineering is the obvious example of interdisciplinary science which composed of Chemical engineering and the medical science.
Another significant fact that should be taken into consideration is that having widespread information in different academic subjects increases the vision of students to find a favorite job in that future. Actually, the major interest of many students at the beginning of education is ambiguous, thus for finding a good job in the future, having overall information and knowledge in many academic subjects is very important. For example, the attention of parents to engineering and medical science is more, consequently, in most cases, they force their children to choose mathematical or natural science in high school. thus, the education of students who having talent in other fields such as art is very ineffective and the chance of this students for obtaining a suitable job in future is very low.
On the basis of the points mentioned above, I am convinced that having extensive study in many academic subjects is very helpful and effective for students because with development in sciences, interdisciplinary science appear so having overall information in major of subjects is very essential. Also, having an overall vision in many academic subjects increases the chance of students for gaining a favorite job in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Nowadays
nowadays, it is commonly accepted that widesprea...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 178, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'academics'' or 'academic's'?
Suggestion: academics'; academic's
...tudents who had broad knowledge of many academics topic, this students in the university ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 195, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...road knowledge of many academics topic, this students in the university education wo...
^^^^
Line 3, column 621, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...ical or natural science in high school. thus, the education of students who having t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 737, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...t is very ineffective and the chance of this students for obtaining a suitable job i...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, consequently, first, if, so, still, thus, for example, in fact, such as, in most cases, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 314.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41082802548 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13109157187 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493630573248 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 558.9 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.5606582759 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.454545455 100.406767564 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5454545455 20.6045352989 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.45110844103 202% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28803162827 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126614583692 0.076458572812 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.093294167396 0.0737576698707 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194281618682 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630860107856 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 11.7677419355 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 58.1214874552 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.10430107527 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.1575268817 163% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.