Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.
In fact, the ability to decide can be an important part of our lives. Whether important deciding by young people in the country is seen as useful advantage for society or not depends on the lens through which one is looking. However, I personally subscribe to this view that young people are not able to make indispensable decisions mainly because experienced people can just easily handle the critical situation, and also political issues are not easy and tangible for everyone to perceive. In-depth discussion on each of the abovementioned reasons is presented below.
First and possibly the most important reason why I believe that young people have no influence on the important decisions in the society is that their perspective is very limited, and young people are not capable to anticipate the future of their country. To be more specific, young people do not have sufficient experiences to be able to make very vital decisions because today's world politics is changing every moment, and only wise and experienced people can control their situations. According to the reliable statistics in Europe countries, the average age in governmental institutions is 56 years. As a result, based on their economic and societal successes, we can conclude that employee's experiences have a significant contribution to country prosperity. For this reason, I strongly believe that young people do not affect the important decisions that determine the future of society.
There is a further word we must consider, which is the fact that the understanding of political issues is not easy for young people. In fact, young people are not able to consider important details, and their vision is very limited. My own experience is also a compelling example of this. I remember that our country had faced different problems such as sanction, drought, etc because our previous president has not sufficient experience to handle the situation of our country, and based on his mistake decision, our country found a very imperfect face in the world. Accordingly, I think that governmental employees should have innovative perspectives to be able to release their country in critical circumstances.
In a word, by taking all the abovementioned reasons into account we may draw the conclusion that young people do not have appropriate experiences to solve major problems of their country.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, look, may, so, i think, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1997.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24146981627 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96045773033 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496062992126 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 633.6 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.9785363919 48.9658058833 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.133333333 100.406767564 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334885942171 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108585109547 0.076458572812 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12224196704 0.0737576698707 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194815484835 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136124066997 0.0645574589148 211% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 11.7677419355 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 58.1214874552 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.