In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Nowadays, cars occupy substantial parts of our lives. Therefore, there is a widely held view among people that using of cars in twenty years will reduce. However, I personally subscribe to the view that it is more reasonable that applying vehicles will be more than there are todey in twenty years mainly because with advancement in science, people are looknig for to amenity and with increasing the number of environmental-friendly cars, the aspirations fo people for using of these cars will enhance. In-depth discussion on each of the abovementioned reasons is presented below.
First and possibly the most important reason why I believe that today’s cars provide the absolute convenience for people so people are searching comfort instinctively. To be more specific, the main inspiration of any government is the providing a modern society for their people to they can attain your favorites instantly, in order to, it is expected the lasting using of cars are increased day to day. A research carried out currently has revealed that using cars in high-population cities are increasing comparetively to recent 20 years. My own experience is also a compelling example of this, when I was young, there were fewer cars in use that there are today and this issue causes the pollution of air or the traffic problem was ignorable in 20 years ago. For this reason, I strongly believe that utilizing of vehicles are increasing tremendously.
There is a further more subtle word we must consider, which is the fact that with fast progressing in industries, manufacturing the environmental-friendly cars will increase and subsequently the motivation of people for utilizing these cars will expand. The main disadvantage of cars in today’s world is pollution problem and if the cars are produced on international protocols so anyone are not able to dictate people for preventing people from using cars. For instance, many goverments or organizations have a grandiose plan for producting cars which are able to decrease the percent of CO and NO gases automatically and governmnets have to invest a significant budget for promoting these cars. Accordingly, someone have adopted the philosophy that using of these cars have not any danger for environment, thus, they will absolutely use these cars.
In a word, by taking all the aforementioned reasons into account we may draw the conclusion that using cars are incresing day to day. This is primarily due to the facts that cars provide an complete amenity for people and the willingness of people for purchasing clear cars is more in comparetively to the past years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...ed on international protocols so anyone are not able to dictate people for preventi...
^^^
Line 3, column 723, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...moting these cars. Accordingly, someone have adopted the philosophy that using of th...
^^^^
Line 4, column 187, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...rily due to the facts that cars provide an complete amenity for people and the wil...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, first, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2197.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 425.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16941176471 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1949822251 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510588235294 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 702.0 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.5127149927 48.9658058833 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.466666667 100.406767564 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 20.6045352989 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53333333333 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335861922425 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115702134351 0.076458572812 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864286615212 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207368672124 0.150856017488 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0800026774616 0.0645574589148 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 11.7677419355 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 58.1214874552 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.