It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.
Questions surrounding whether students should study many academic subjects at university have been ongoing in the last years, since universities have become more and more popular and an increasing number of people decide to attend these institutions. While some people believe that specializing in one specific subject is more efficient and proficuous than studying a wide variety of subjects, others believe that focusing on an ample range of academic subjects is more beneficial. In my opinion, knowing more than a subject is better. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First, people have more job opportunities if they are prepared in many subjects. In fact, nowadays companies have been looking for employees who can accomplish a large amount of tasks since hiring specialized workers is expensive and because people who have a broader knowledge are more flexible and prepared to solve firms’ problems. For instance, my father got two degrees, one in engineering and another in chemistry: his deep understanding of technical processes allowed him to be hired in ENI, the most famous petroleum company in the world. He has told me if he had not graduated in chemistry as well, he would never have gained the respect and the authority that now has in the business. In fact, his job consists in plant design, which requires both engineering and chemistry. Engineering helps you to decide the size of each component in the plant, while chemistry is important to understand how to process and refine petroleum, which will be stored in some containers in the plant. Thus, learning more than a subject has a beneficial impact on your future job and
career.
Second, studying many subjects satisfies people’s curiosity and broaden their horizons. Students need to learn more and more since they are curious about the outside world. Besides universities are a stimulating intellectual environment because students can improve their knowledge and become more critical about the social and political problems. If I studied only mathematics or physics, I would not feel accomplished: I like being continuously stimulated and asking some questions to myself, such as “how this machine works”, “why the sky is light blue” and so on. Learning subjects from many fields helps you to increase your culture and makes you a better person, since people who study only a subject are ignorant about everything beyond what they have studied. Therefore, studying more than a subject improves people’s lives.
All in all, this essay discussed why having large knowledge is beneficial and essential for students. This is because people increase their job prospects and because they enrich their personality and expand their eyesight.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1079, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...beneficial impact on your future job and career. Second, studying many subject...
^^^
Line 6, column 179, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Besides,
...ey are curious about the outside world. Besides universities are a stimulating intellec...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 500, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted and asking some questions to myself, such as 'how this machine works&apo...
^^
Line 6, column 545, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h as 'how this machine works', 'why the sky is light blue' an...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, look, second, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, for instance, i feel, in fact, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2360.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 443.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32731376975 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86073901087 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541760722348 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 732.6 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.9354348853 48.9658058833 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.210526316 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3157894737 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73684210526 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280096363991 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896830964463 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897403399027 0.0737576698707 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167934074234 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102221471982 0.0645574589148 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.