It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own.
In this modern world which we are living in, news is of great importance for people, since they like to increase their knowledge and information by being aware of what is happening in the whole world. Personally, I believe that reading or watching news represented by people who have different views is more beneficial for us. I feel this way for some reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, obtaining news from various resources helps people to better distinct the differences between right and wrong. When people hear different views they van better realize all the aspects of an event. In addition, their cognitive ability and critical thinking will be improved. As a result of this, they are better able to analyze the causes of many of their own problems in life and evaluate a problem from many different angles. My uncle, who is a big fan of watching news from different sources is a compelling example of this. One of the main routines he has in his life is listening to different radio news and reading many newspapers. Once I asked him why he bothers to read the same news so many times. After that, he explained that this is not about the news, but about life. He explained that how he has learned to develop critical thinking by evaluating and comparing news from people with different perspectives.
Moreover, when people try to listen to opposing views and contemplate on the ideas that are different from their own, they might realize that maybe their own thoughts are not true and thus become more flexible to change them. Therefore, they become more inclined to change their false beliefs and ready to embrace new ones. For example, last year an election in my home country caused many controversies. Many people believed that the real reason behind all the problems caused was the president. However, when they watched a television debate they understood that they have judged too soon. As a result they changed their idea.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that listening and watching different news provides people with the opportunity to become more critical and more flexible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 127, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...he differences between right and wrong. When people hear different views they van be...
^^^^
Line 4, column 420, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ems in life and evaluate a problem from many different angles. My uncle, who is a big fan of w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 593, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...erstood that they have judged too soon. As a result they changed their idea. In...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1783.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 362.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92541436464 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54104759216 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53591160221 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7113065412 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8421052632 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0526315789 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78947368421 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264959753927 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845591143596 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763452310381 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170970358983 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427647556652 0.0645574589148 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.