It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts.
Learning a variety of topics and understanding concepts is crucial for the well development of an individual. It is thought by some people that facts play an important role in presenting true information that is worth memorizing. However, in my view, people should focus on learning more real concepts and ideas that led to that conclusion. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore as follows.
First of all, it is essential for people to realize that learning facts do not mean that they understood the idea that lays behind that. People should be capable of distinguishing the concepts and ideas from the facts, which may be sometimes an error of inefficient analyzes. For instance, I had read an article about the results of a study that was conducted by the university of Toronto. The results were way beyond very incorrect. That it took a couple of months to come up as true. Meanwhile, students were referred to those results as real facts. Therefore, they were memorizing something that did not have any value in the long run. If students were focused on understanding the concept that was standing behind this, they would not have put such an effort to learn false facts. Overall, it is better for learners to understand ideas first.
Second of all, Students who learn ideas would be more prepared than students who memorize facts. Students who are capable of understanding concepts would be able to broaden their knowledge and increase their critical thinking. They would be able to endure and overcome adversity and realize their potential. My experience as a student who is focused on ideas and concepts is a compelling example of this. About ten years ago, I studied international history. It was very hard for me to memorize all the facts such as dates of different events. In order to overcome this challenge, I just put in a lot of effort to better understand the ideas that led those events to happen at that particular time. Actually, that was the best method ever that helped me not only during my university years, but also in my real life. In addition to that I changed the way of facing a challenge moment that crossed my way. Therefore, I was flexible and practical dealing with difficult times. It is clear that students should endeavor the complexity and learn ideas and concepts.
In conclusion, I think it is better for all people to learn ideas than the facts. This is because people can better understand and remember what they have just learned and because they could broaden their knowledge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 657, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tter understand the ideas that led those events to happen at that particular time...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, i feel, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 25.0 11.0286738351 227% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2120.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 437.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85125858124 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66018478876 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480549199085 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 644.4 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.6958740939 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.5384615385 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8076923077 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38415902475 0.236089414692 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100325907956 0.076458572812 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904740204834 0.0737576698707 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251739279024 0.150856017488 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453627706605 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.