It is more important for universities to invest in infrastructure and physical plant than to invest in keeping the faculty satisfied.
Providing outstanding education is the goal of all universities. It is highly debated whether it is more important for universities to have high quality infrastructure and physical plant than a high satisfaction among faculties. While some people claim satisfied faculty is more important so that they can provide better teaching to students, others hold the opposite opinion. In my opinion, I firmly believe that good physical facilities are more important.
To begin with, delivering extraordinary research result and academic performance often requires qualified physical facilities. For example, if a school does not have a good laboratory, it will be hard for chemistry students to complete experiments in practice and hence may lead to poor learning. Furthermore, if chemistry students need to work on papers about some specific chemical compounds, without the existence of labs, they probably cannot produce any result. Hence, qualified physical facilities are necessary for education.
Some people might argue that satisfied faculty will result in better teaching quality and thus students will benefit more. At first glance, the argument may seem to be plausible, but further reflection reveals that it leaves out some significant factors that should be addressed to substantiate the argument. It is clear that without having qualified infrastructure and physical plant, the advantage and the synergy that better teaching will not exist. If a university recruits prestigious professor and contributes to his high satisfaction, the professor might give passionate lecture. However, if the lecture is taken place in a shabby classroom without a projector, a usable blackboard, and even comfortable chairs, it is hard for students to stay focus and understand thoroughly. Therefore, qualified physical facilities are key factors to ensure the efficacy of good lectures.
To sum up, it is more critical for universities to invest on physical facilities instead of faculty satisfaction because physical facilities are needed for both learning and doing research. In addition, they serve as the key factors for the efficacy of good teaching resource. Accordingly, investing on physical facilities should be the more important investment for universities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "requires qualified" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'qualifiing' or 'to be qualified'.
Suggestion: qualifiing; to be qualified
...and academic performance often requires qualified physical facilities. For example, if a ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in addition, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1928.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 339.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68731563422 4.8611393121 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09673262661 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551622418879 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1690452074 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.411764706 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9411764706 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.17647058824 5.45110844103 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330289090953 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101244447597 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113207078187 0.0737576698707 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210525894641 0.150856017488 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124894881649 0.0645574589148 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 58.1214874552 61% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 10.9000537634 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.