Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Whether the ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people or the ability to make new friends easily is more important for happiness remains a controversial debate. In my opinion, the ability to keep the friendship with several people over time is more important for happiness since the interaction with old friends is more relaxing and that there are more connections and memories built in the friendship.
If friendship lasts from a long period of time, friends would have better understanding about each other and thus it is easier and relaxing to hang out with old friends. Sometimes when you meet new people, you probably need to mask up your real self in order to leave them good impressions. By doing so, you would feel ill at ease and pressured at times. However, hanging out with old friends allow you to be yourself since they already know who you really are and what's better is that they accept who you are. Therefore, since old friends bring the interaction more genuine and relaxing, it brings more happiness.
Besides, having old friends means you possibly have more memories and stories shared with them and that leads to a stronger, firmer and happier relationship. I have friends from middle school and I still regard them as the closest friends though I have some new ones in university. That is because friends I have known from middle school went through so many things with me and that made them so precious. Having developed so many memories together gives me the special intimate feelings and as well strengthen our friendships. Consequently, the long standing friendship brings more happiness for me.
To sum up, having the ability to maintain old friendships can bring happier and more relaxing interaction. In addition, the copious memories shared with old friends made the friendships firmer and satisfying. Therefore, I think that the ability to maintain friendships for a long period of time is more important for happiness.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...he ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people or the ability to make new frien...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...hip. If friendship lasts from a long period of time, friends would have better understandin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 466, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...hey already know who you really are and whats better is that they accept who you are....
^^^^^
Line 7, column 281, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...lity to maintain friendships for a long period of time is more important for happiness.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, however, if, really, so, still, then, therefore, thus, well, i think, in addition, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 329.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01823708207 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69176695401 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492401215805 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 485.1 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2195429047 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.066666667 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9333333333 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.45110844103 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395700779143 0.236089414692 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149881342789 0.076458572812 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126510515035 0.0737576698707 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280262222453 0.150856017488 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1398620199 0.0645574589148 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 86.8835125448 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.