A lot of high school students now cheat in homework assignments, by asking other students for answers. Which of the following do you think is the most efficient way to stop?
1)asking parents to help stop the students from cheating
2)penalty or punishment to the students
3)asking teacher to create homework assignment that cannot be easily cheated
Cheating in everything is unethical behavior, and it should be stop especially at school where individual’ personality is form. Although some people think that monitoring or punishments by parents is an effective way in order to reduce this manner. Personally speaking, I believe that teachers have more impact on students for two reasons: The teachers understand their discipline background, and penalty can lead to terrible outcome.
To begin with, teachers possess more information about students’ academic performance rather than parents. They have a great amount of time on class to observe students in many different ways and fully understand their strength and weakness point. However, by the explosion of technology, disciplines can use mobile or computer to access Internet to communicate with their friends, and it is difficult for parents to control them. Moreover, in many situations, parents also support their children in number of ways. Therefore, teachers possibly have better control and easily distinguish who are more prone to cheating.
Moreover, penalty or punishment can cause many negative consequences rather than its benefits. By obsessing scary emotion, students tend to finish their homework as fast as they can and find the new approach which is hard to recognise by parents or teachers. Consequently, it becomes a detrimental habit for students’ future. My own experience can demonstrate this point. When I was a high-school student, to avoid a high penalty of committee I used to change new-jet printer to copy my assignment. It helped me create the printing paper look exactly the same with handwriting paper, and I received A+ score in that curriculum. As a result, the disadvantages of punishment outweigh its usefulness so it is not efficient way to prevent cheating behavior.
To wrap it up, by prohibiting cheating action, teachers should distribute homework task which are difficult to cheat. By understand students’ capacity, the teachers can easily identify cheating students and punishment makes this behavior go to terrible way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 64, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'stopped'?
Suggestion: stopped
...is unethical behavior, and it should be stop especially at school where individual&a...
^^^^
Line 2, column 178, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...of time on class to observe students in many different ways and fully understand their strengt...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1776.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 322.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51552795031 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12492891783 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605590062112 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5519990532 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.470588235 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9411764706 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58823529412 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26936214932 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797859278018 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548926137805 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173452017405 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531732451882 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.