In many places, students aged 12-18 are typically taught different subjects by different teachers, while
younger students are usually taught by only one teacher all day long. Some people believe it would also
benefit younger students to be taught by several different teachers every day. Do you agree with this
view? Why or why not?
Since the dawn of civilization, education has been playing a crucial role in people’s lives. People usually concern about various methods and strategies to optimize the efficiency of their children during their school years. In this regard, there is a long-standing discussion among individuals about the efficiency of using various teachers for younger students. Some people may hold the view that applying numerous teachers can benefit students more, while, some others take an opposite viewpoint. I personally contend that utilizing numerous teachers would elevate the performance of the education. In the following, I will elaborate upon my standpoint through two reasonable pieces of evidence.
First and foremost, teaching different courses by different teachers can pave the way for improving children’s knowledge. In other words, when pupils have the opportunity to experience various teachers for various courses, they can take full advantages of teachers’ knowledge for broadening their horizon and enriching their information. According to a recent study that has done in Tehran University, the performance of two group of students at the secondary and primary schools has been observed. The scientists asked the principals of those schools to teach a specific course in a different method. Students of the secondary schools had to take that course with one teacher and students of the primary schools had to take various classes for passing that specific course. The results of the study were interesting. Primary students had grasped the entire details and facts of that course more effectively thanks to the fact that different teachers had used their own pieces of knowledge for enabling students to learn more.
Another reason which deserves some words here is that statistics show that when students are tutored by a specific and determined person as their specified teacher, they usually develop a strong relationship with that person that can damage the process of learning. Additionally, students at younger ages are more inclined to spend more time on their hobbies and games than paying attention to their studies. Thus, when students are taught by a determined teacher not only they do pay less attention to their teachers but also have less fear about the punishments of their teachers. Take a personal experience as an example, when I studied in secondary school, I used to have a static teacher for all of my courses. Additionally, I always tried to be an organized and hard work pupil. However, sometimes when I forgot to do my homework, my teacher neglects my faults and forgives me. But, when I entered primary school with various teachers, none of them had this treatment against me. Consequently, I had been forced to push myself out of my comfort zone and study harder than before helping me to enter a high-ranked university. Hadn’t I had the opportunity to force by my teachers to study harder, I would not have accepted in that prestigious university.
In brief, one can logically draw the conclusion that using various teachers for younger students can help them in terms of applying a wide range of teacher’s knowledge for elevating students’ knowledge and helping students be more responsible for their courses and grades. However, there are other reasons and examples, challenging these reasons, not mentioned above. All in all, worthwhile to state that a survey can assess the validity of this argument.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, second, so, thus, while, in brief, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2926.0 1977.66487455 148% => OK
No of words: 551.0 407.700716846 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31034482759 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84493438435 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91550390892 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 271.0 212.727598566 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491833030853 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 895.5 618.680645161 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3600425834 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.04 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.04 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.96 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226507225184 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601649980964 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507123296809 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144912593994 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00978248658033 0.0645574589148 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 86.8835125448 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.