Nowadays, food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved
the way people live? Use specific reasons and examples to support your
answer
It is undeniable that food has become easier to prepare thanks to the development of technology and economics. This affects a lot on our lives. Some people argue that food becoming easier to make has a bad effect on people lives while others hold with the idea that this makes many significant improvements in our lives. I agree with the second opinion and I will explore some reasons in the following essay.
To begin with, it is obvious that technology helps food become easier to make. In the past, people just used woods and rocks to heat the food which took them a lot of time to finish the cooking. Moreover, to have woods and rocks, they had to find them in the forests which was very dangerous because there were many dangers in the forests. Then, they had to catch the fire by woods and rocks which was very difficult and needed to have many luck and skills to do. So, in the past, people spent much time even all day preparing food. However, everything has changed now with the development of technology. People just clean the food and press the button on the machine they want to cook like microwaves or cooks, etc. Then, the machines do the remain for them. They just wait or do anything else until the machines notify that they have already done the food after the beep. Technology helps us take a few time to prepare food so people can have much time to do others things. Thus, people’s lives have improved a lot.
Secondly, with the development of economics, people can make food easier. In the past, people didn’t have much money to invent many technologies. Moreover, they didn’t have much appliances available. Electricity was just invented in the eighteenth century which have a big role in inventing many technologies in the future. Thus, before the eighteenth century, people didn’t have much money and machines that forced them to use woods and rocks to prepare food. However, now, with the rapid development of economics, people can have enough money and machines that helps create many technologies which are useful for our lives. Nowadays, there are more and more machines that uses less electricity but keep their efficiency. Thus, people have many helpful cooks and microwaves that help them do many things in making food. Therefore, they can spend much time for leisure activities and their interests.
In conclusion, the food has become easier to prepare which helps improve people’s lives. With the development of technology and economics, machines replace people to make food which not only helps people have much time to do other things but also helps preparing food easier for people. Because of these reasons, people’s lives has improves a lot since food becomes easier to make.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 739, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...es or cooks, etc. Then, the machines do the remain for them. They just wait or do anything...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 901, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'few times'.
Suggestion: few times
...er the beep. Technology helps us take a few time to prepare food so people can have much...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...echnologies. Moreover, they didn’t have much appliances available. Electricity was j...
^^^^
Line 4, column 253, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to prepare' or 'prepare'.
Suggestion: to prepare; prepare
... time to do other things but also helps preparing food easier for people. Because of thes...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2263.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 467.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84582441113 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42236876973 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.426124197002 0.524837075471 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 702.0 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.5128080848 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.8148148148 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2962962963 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24424937269 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904323968417 0.076458572812 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823670447523 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203507659072 0.150856017488 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074819916327 0.0645574589148 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.75 8.01818996416 84% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.