Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups, and all members of the group receive the same grade (mark) on the project. Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to evaluate students?
It is generally agreed today that doing a project during study at universities is a master key not only to increasing the knowledge of students but also to examining the information that they have obtained. In addition, grading their work which defines their quality in a course is a controversial issue. Due to its essential characteristics, there is a long-standing discussion among universities and high schools that students work on projects in groups and whether all of them get the same mark on the project or not. Although it is a little hard to reach a consensus on this issue, I, myself, do believe that working in a group and all group members getting the same grade is the best decision that universities can make. It can results in effective work, constructive interaction among group members, and improve the quality of work by using new and different ideas.
To commence, one of the compelling reasons that proves my thesis is that teamwork is more effective than working alone based on many scientific types of research. On the one hand, students in a team can reach out to others to share their ideas, on the other hand, they can share the responsibilities and do part of the work. Sometimes, students need more time to do a project, but when they share it and each of them just focuses on a small segment, they can finish it at a right time. As a result, students learn to cooperate in the project by sharing new ideas in order to handle part of a project as a team member. In fact, it is the definition of teamwork that is an essential tool in today's competitive world.
Let us continue by considering the fact having interaction with other people can prepare the student for future life. It is worth mentioning that the goal of the education system is to prepare students to be part of a prosperous society as long as the development of a country is concerned. In short, working in a team can teach students the concept of living and surviving in a community in which cooperation always is above all. For instance, they learn many useful and applicable skills such as respecting others, attending social programs, and so on so forth.
Last but not the least, new and different ideas result in new solutions to a complex problems. When students participate in a group to do a project, it does not matter what they do, but the idea that they are sharing is important. It is crystal clear that many rational minds are more reliable than one single. As an example, sometimes a simple idea or a comment can solve a significant problem like my friend's comment in our mathematics group. I recall that one time we wanted to solve a problem, but we could not find a logical solution, suddenly she said, '' gravity is negative'', by raising this fact, she solve a big problem that we had a big problem to solve it. By doing so, she solved the problem in just by few words. To put it in general words, as long as people present some ideas in a group, they deserve to take an equal grade.
To draw upon the reasons, although some exceptions are excluded from the general rule, I supported the idea that student do their projects in groups and all members get the same grade. This policy presents many benefits for students such as working effectively, having constructive interaction with other members, and solving the problem with different and new ideas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 734, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'result'
Suggestion: result
...sion that universities can make. It can results in effective work, constructive interac...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 86, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'problem'?
Suggestion: problem
...as result in new solutions to a complex problems. When students participate in a group t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 559, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d a logical solution, suddenly she said, gravity is negative, by raising this fac...
^^
Line 7, column 608, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'solves'.
Suggestion: solves
... is negative, by raising this fact, she solve a big problem that we had a big problem...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, for instance, in addition, in fact, in general, in short, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 81.0 52.1666666667 155% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2785.0 1977.66487455 141% => OK
No of words: 595.0 407.700716846 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68067226891 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.93888872473 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72153933604 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 274.0 212.727598566 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460504201681 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 865.8 618.680645161 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.725903437 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.086956522 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8695652174 20.6045352989 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.04347826087 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315941769507 0.236089414692 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0914953850236 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0995628897085 0.0737576698707 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188742747239 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127148236804 0.0645574589148 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.