Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups, and all members of the group receive the same grade (mark) on the project. Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to evaluate students?
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words Do not use memorized examples.
Working in groups and teams, is an important factor in life. No matter what organization or company we join we need to work in teams at one point. Therefore, ther has been extensive debate about whether it is more efficient to evaluate students on their work separately or as a whole. In my view, professors need to assign students grades based on individual contribution to the project.
First, often times there is one person exhausted after a project. There are many cases that groupmates rely on only one or two members to complete and present the assignments and even gain the same score as the one who did most if not all of the project. This leads to exhaustion of one members while others enjoy a free ride to a good grade. For example, in my last year of university we had a group project for technical languages class. All my teammates other than one anounced that they couldn't help much because their english was not good and all of the work even making the powerpoint fell on me and my other groupmate. After finishing the assignment I was totally exhasted which led me to falling behind on some other assignments I had. Therefore, I belive that when groupmates are graded together much of the work may be done by one person and exhaust them while there would be no tangible awards for their hardwork.
Second, responsibility is an important factor in our life. In the society it is essential to take care of our own assignments because in workplace we are evaluated based on individual results even in teams. By grading group assignments by taking each individuals contributions into consideration schools can train students for their future. For example, A friend of mine always relied on her group mates to earn a passable grade. After graduation she started working as an intern, and was given an assignment to work on as a team with other interns. Due to competition between coworkers nobody covered for her and the leader of the group revealed to the chief that she had minimal participation. Hence, she wasn't hired and had to look for a new job after her internship finished. Based on this experience I believe that if grades were assigned individualy she would have been used to working effectively in a group and could have gotten hired.
In conclusion, I believe grades need to be assigned individully based on each persons contributions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 297, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rk separately or as a whole. In my view, professors need to assign students grade...
^^
Line 2, column 235, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...me score as the one who did most if not all of the project. This leads to exhaustion of on...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 491, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...mates other than one anounced that they couldnt help much because their english was not...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 548, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... because their english was not good and all of the work even making the powerpoint fell on...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 626, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...oint fell on me and my other groupmate. After finishing the assignment I was totally ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 136, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e care of our own assignments because in workplace we are evaluated based on indi...
^^
Line 3, column 708, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...e had minimal participation. Hence, she wasnt hired and had to look for a new job aft...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, look, may, second, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1954.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76585365854 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76503622798 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534146341463 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2715780669 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230656932087 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711723470415 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536537271758 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129196004586 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492523837713 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.