In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.
These days gathering data and information we seek for is very easier than before because of all the resources available such as website and other sources. In my point of view, I think getting data from various sources is much better than only source. It is obvious that may be not many of these resources aren’t worthy but useable. In this passage I am going to describe three reason to prove the idea.
To begin with, different resources are always available. Using all the resources to check the data we want to fetch is must because sometimes among all the resources only one is the trustable one to collect the correct information. As a result, when many resources are available, overall with huge amount of data you can be easily have valuable data, each part may be from different source. For instance, for a chemical arguments many different weblogs and physical resources are available so when a student wants to solve and debate about such subjects he or she needs to know many data about that particular topic which may should seek it from different resources, as a result beside all good understanding which student can gain from different resources, they can have extra information from other resource that is not must but optional but it will help to understand that concept much clearly.
Secondly, selecting right information after reading all sources with all availability. As a result, a person can recognize different idea from different authors such as weblog or physical sources and select the logic one. In fact, you see all the ideas and then gather all or select one of them to be the right data, but in the same time, you have the other ideas and evaluated them. For instances , a scientist can check different idea from different scientist from different sources and compare with his own idea to check who has the same view as him.
Last but not least, people always prefer to check out many resources to be sure that the information they have right now is correct or no, so navigating through many resources can assure them to have a right data which it has very good psychologic impact on their knowledge. For example, a person which is trying to get the result for benefit of a medicine, many sources give many descriptions about that pill but when 2 sources say same thing so he or she can trust the concept rather than rely on one source.
To sum up, having many resources to collect data about a topic you looking for is very helpful because people never can trust only a source to rely on. As a result, they check many sources to be much happier for their result.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ct the correct information. As a result, when many resources are available, overa...
^^
Line 2, column 421, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'argument'?
Suggestion: argument
...nt source. For instance, for a chemical arguments many different weblogs and physical res...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 431, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... For instance, for a chemical arguments many different weblogs and physical resources are avai...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 397, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... ideas and evaluated them. For instances , a scientist can check different idea fr...
^^
Line 5, column 226, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es to be much happier for their result.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, for example, for instance, i think, in fact, such as, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2145.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 458.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68340611354 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45669534642 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.445414847162 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 677.7 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 106.552932122 48.9658058833 218% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 134.0625 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.625 20.6045352989 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6875 5.45110844103 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293102598243 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105646411142 0.076458572812 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560167186124 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174196805647 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607454014424 0.0645574589148 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 58.1214874552 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.46 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.