Parents give their children weekly money to buy whatever they want. Some people think this can cause bad habits and ideas about money in children. Others think the opposite. What’s your opinion?
Money is used to meet subsistence demand not only for adults, but children need it as well. Some parents decide to give children weekly money, but others claim that it may cause bad influence. From my perspective, I am all for moderately giving weekly money to children.
It is true that there are some cases about wasting money or spending on something unnecessary among children. If they get a huge sum of money, it is hard to figure out whether the products they want to buy is good or not and control themselves from spending too much. Quite a few children who get large numbers of money from parents tend to put their money into computer games and they are more likely addicted to the internet. In this situation, weekly money causes bad habits to children. That is why I mentioned parents need to give the money moderately. To be more specific, making sure the money is within the children’s consumption level and only once a week, so that children are not able to buy things without a limit. Meanwhile, parents do not need to worry about the bad influence to children.
Moreover, giving children weekly money is the best approach to teach them a correct concept of money. Money itself is not wrong, the key is how to use it. Parents have the duty to pay attention to consumption education for children and help them to form positive idea of money and consumption. Take my own experience, for example, when I was a child my parents did not give me any money. If I wanted something, they preferred to buy it for me directly rather than allowing me to purchase by myself. As I am growing up, I suddenly find that I cannot manage money greatly. I have no idea about how to utilize the money such as buying more for less and making decision among numerous products. It becomes my parents’ pity that did not offer me the chance to realize the power of money.
Furthermore, money can build up confidence. If parents refuse to give them money, which means they are not allowed to acquire something they desire to buy. For young children, they cannot understand the reason why parents do not give them money is avoiding fostering bad habits. They probably believe that their family is poorer than others and they do not have enough money to afford more than demands of living. This incorrect realization easily causes a negative emotion to young children and makes them feel inferior. When friends invite them to a party, they can only reject since they have no money to buy a gift; when classmates eat snacks afterschool, they can only envy and then back to home; when other children plan to go to shopping center, they even do not have money to buy a bus ticket to arrive there. Your children will be depressed and lose confidence gradually just because of lack of money which can be used freely.
To put it to a nutshell, giving weekly money temperately will benefit children. They can build up a right conception of money and consumption, and get away from feeling interior.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, then, well, while, for example, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2465.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 530.0 407.700716846 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65094339623 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79809637944 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49423757391 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48679245283 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 775.8 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9773037334 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2962962963 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6296296296 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.40740740741 5.45110844103 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.484824771397 0.236089414692 205% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161263779858 0.076458572812 211% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790610588454 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.311463226097 0.150856017488 206% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703087708444 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.