In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future
Everyone gets concerned and worried about which job will make them more successful and guarantee them a better life style. Some people think that it was easier in the past to identify which job is more secure. Others don't really believe that there is anyway to identify whether the future of a certain job would be bright or not. In my view I agree that in the past it was easier to identify which jobs are more guaranteed and which are not. In this essay I will discuss why do I think so.
First, in the past there was much less variety in jobs than nowadays. Obviously having less options means getting less confused about which job is better. In addition, there was much less successful people back then, which means that it was easier to find out how did these people become successful and follow their career path. For example, in my family my grandfather had a successful business. So when my dad became old enough he didn't hesitate to choose business and trading as his future career.
Second, there was much less opportunity to get education in the past. People used to be poor in average and societies weren't that advanced. Going to college used to be such an extraordinary thing. Consequently, being less educated about the different possibilities in life limited the range of thinking back then. So people used to follow whatever they see working. That's why they didn't spend much time being confused and hesitated about their futures. For example, in school we learnt about different fields in life and when we were in high school we had to choose a certain major to study. That was such a difficult task for us. Since we knew there was a lot of majors that we could go for and guarantee a successful future, this made it really difficult on us to choose which one should we go for.
Third, people were not that interested in economy. The way of thinking back then was focused on how could people make money to cover their basic life costs. People weren't looking for wealth. Having such attitude made it easier to them to choose whatever job that will provide them with the basic life rights. However, nowadays everyone is looking for wealth and competing with each other about who has the highest debt in their bank accounts. For example, a couple of weeks ago i was checking the graphs that show how many times did people search "How to be rich as soon as possible" using Google drive. The results were crazy. Millions of people are searching this everyday. Which proofs how much we are focused on our financial situations nowadays.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...entify which job is more secure. Others dont really believe that there is anyway to ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 434, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ss. So when my dad became old enough he didnt hesitate to choose business and trading...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 119, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
...sed to be poor in average and societies werent that advanced. Going to college used to...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 367, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...ed to follow whatever they see working. Thats why they didnt spend much time being co...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 382, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...atever they see working. Thats why they didnt spend much time being confused and hesi...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 165, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
...to cover their basic life costs. People werent looking for wealth. Having such attitud...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 479, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...nts. For example, a couple of weeks ago i was checking the graphs that show how m...
^
Line 7, column 677, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
.... Millions of people are searching this everyday. Which proofs how much we are focused o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 687, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... of people are searching this everyday. Which proofs how much we are focused on our f...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
anyway, consequently, first, however, if, look, really, second, so, then, third, for example, i think, in addition, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2113.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 452.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67477876106 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35606381289 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486725663717 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 651.6 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.5675470697 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.4642857143 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1428571429 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216352074174 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593947647241 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833311504181 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154144503518 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109158970308 0.0645574589148 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 11.7677419355 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.09 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.