People learn things better from those at their own level- such as fellow students or co workers- than from those at a higher level, such as teachers or supervisors.
Teaching and learning are two phenomenon which goes together. If one is not taught in a good manner, the probability that he or she understand the subject being taught is at a very low level. I believe that people learn better from those at their own level because it creates for those who are learning a safe environment for asking, it is more easy for the own on ones'level to emphatize with him or her, and it will reduce the complexity that would otherwise be involved in the the teaching part.
Firstly, people are more likely to open up to the ones in the same age range that they are not understanding the subject. Knowing that the learner is not getting the lesson makes the learning process more effective as it helps the teacher to understand that may be he or she should shift to another teaching method which would make it easier for the learn. However, the learners might fear a teacher who is very old compared to them which can hinder them from understanding the concept as the teacher will stop teaching thinking that the learner have got it because of absence of questions. Therefore, learning with a peer is more productive.
Secondly, It is much more easy for a peer to empathize with each other than it is for a teacher to a student. This can make a student feel that even though he or she is failing, they are still a change to improve. For instance, there was a chapter in Math that I had failed to understand. I had tried all my best I even went to the teacher for advises, but they could not help me because I was feeling that I was the only one to whom things were difficult. Finally, a friend of mine came and motivated me. She told me how she have also gone through such thing, and finally she helped me to learn that chapter. From then, I got a full understanding of that chapter. This was because all I need was not just explanations; I needed someone to empathize with and my friend was the best candidate.
In addition, students explain to each other in a less complex way. Students know more about what is making their fellow to not understand; therefore, they are able to come up with a simplified form to explain the concept. To illustrate, when I was still in senior six, our physics teacher introduced the topic of atomic physics. He was teaching us about it as if we already know it; almost class did not understand that topic. One of our classmates who had understood it, asked the teachers some time to share with the class what he knew. However, this time the topic seemed to be so simple because he used examples that were familiar to use and that made it is for us to understand. Thus, even though teacher might have much knowledge they might some time not be able to know how to share that knowledge with their students.
To sum up, even though teachers might have experience and high degrees of education, their teaching manner is not as effective as the teaching provided by a student to his or her fellow because it is more easy to ask a question to your fellow, fellow can empathize with the student which can motivate them, the teaching are less complex.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'phenomenon' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'phenomena', 'phenomenons'.
Suggestion: phenomena; phenomenons
Teaching and learning are two phenomenon which goes together. If one is not taug...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'understands'.
Suggestion: understands
... manner, the probability that he or she understand the subject being taught is at a very l...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 221, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... low level. I believe that people learn better from those at their own level because i...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 476, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ity that would otherwise be involved in the the teaching part. Firstly, people ar...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 476, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ity that would otherwise be involved in the the teaching part. Firstly, people ar...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...he ones in the same age range that they are not understanding the subject. Knowing that the learner i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: MAY_BE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'maybe' (=perhaps)?
Suggestion: maybe
...it helps the teacher to understand that may be he or she should shift to another teach...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 347, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...g method which would make it easier for the learn. However, the learners might fear a tea...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 794, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h and my friend was the best candidate. In addition, students explain to each ot...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 690, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t made it is for us to understand. Thus, even though teacher might have much know...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, thus, for instance, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 15.1003584229 232% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 25.0 11.0286738351 227% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 85.0 43.0788530466 197% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2556.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 569.0 407.700716846 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.4920913884 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88402711743 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47536408042 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.442882249561 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 792.0 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.6457518514 48.9658058833 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.130434783 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7391304348 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17391304348 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192111411483 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489627312158 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563367708961 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1151829832 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0786798512588 0.0645574589148 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 10.9000537634 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.