People learn things better from those at their own level—such as
fellow students or co-workers—than from those at a higher level,
such as teachers or supervisors.
Learning starts from the moment a child is born and lasts till its last breath. With time, learning has its different forms with the changes in developmental stages of person. But which type of learning we are exactly talking about? Learning can be spontaneous, which a person and all animated species in this world perceived through external stimulus by gaining knowledge from what they see around, form their peers, or from their own family or relatives. And the type of learning which is commonly acknowledged and is believed to starts with formal ambience under teachers, supervisors or professionals entrusted with such teachings.
Learning shapes a person’s innate character, personality or acumen which he carries in the long run and contributes to the society at large. So learning tends to be very subjective and depends on relative choice of every person on whether they choose formal learning which developes their basic potential to grab future complexities of life or experimental knowledge earned from peers and coming generations.In my opinion, the formal system of learning initiated is the very epitome of all future learnings acquired by a person.
Can friends and juniors really sanction or affirm any proposition made by us when we face difficult problems? Friends and peers can surely help us to solve a problem with their own experience but if something new comes up, they do not have that age old knowledge to exercise in solving such problem. My personal experience can be a compelling evidence to support this answer. During college days, I had to submit some case reports for my thesis paper. My best friend helped me to get some books from library to get some study reports. And I thought of not describing my project teacher for that. But later I came to know that such cases were not presented with proper citations and my thesis was not chosen for the publication. My project teacher later helped me to understand how citations are used chronologically to present a case. So even though my friend had helped me but lack of experience has landed me in trouble.
Secondly, I can draw another instance to unequivocally state that how our mentors help us in advancement of our learning rather than someone who is at par with us. Once I remember in office my Manager has cautioned me to sign on certain documents only after a proper scrutiny of its contents. But suddenly I got carried away by one of my colleague when he asked me not to be so laborious and be flexible enough to get those done just at a mere glance.Later it was revealed that the documents contained certain misinformation about the client and the client had accused my company for such great hazards. It was then my Manager who helped me got out of it by providing a quick relief by getting it executed after proper perusal.
To sum up, it can be said that knowledge of peers and the juniors who are the upcoming generations with vivid enthusiasm can serve us great help but our mentors like teachers or supervisors or even the elderly members of our family serves as the basic pillars of our knowledge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntal stages of person. But which type of learning we are exactly talking about? L...
^^
Line 3, column 409, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...arned from peers and coming generations.In my opinion, the formal system of learni...
^^
Line 7, column 453, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Later
...to get those done just at a mere glance.Later it was revealed that the documents cont...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...with vivid enthusiasm can serve us great help but our mentors like teachers or su...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, really, second, secondly, so, then, thus, talking about, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 13.8261648746 203% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 63.0 43.0788530466 146% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 79.0 52.1666666667 151% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2582.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 532.0 407.700716846 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85338345865 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80261649409 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74912039649 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 278.0 212.727598566 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522556390977 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 807.3 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.0828056763 48.9658058833 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.952380952 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154977630822 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431114566741 0.076458572812 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372369634164 0.0737576698707 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.083801950717 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417809661947 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.