People learn things better from those at their own level-such as fellow students or co-workers- than from those at a higher level, such as teachers and supervisors.
Do you agree or disagree with the above statement?
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
People are social beings and during their life, they are always learning and improving themselves. Interactions and discussions with their fellow-men are the best ways of obtaining new pieces of knowledge. But people learn better things from those ones at their own level of from those at a higher level? I definitely believe that the best way for someone to learn is by asking and cooperate with someone at the same level such as a student from his fellow students. In this essay, some of the most important points supporting this claim will be discussed.
To begin with, dealing and interacting with people at your own level is always easier and less stressful. The individual is not under high pressure like he would be in case of a discussion with someone at a higher level. He can express himself more efficiently without hesitating and fears of potential mistakes. A person being relaxed can focus more on the procedure of learning something that would be more difficult if he had to deal with someone who he would be stress with. Thus, the process of acquiring new knowledge becomes more relieving and the productivity of learners might increase.
Furthermore, it should be mentioned that people at the same level such as a student with his fellow student of co-workers face usually if not same then similar difficulties and challenges. This means that there is a better understanding between them that can promise a friendly and more harmonious cooperation for upcoming tasks to be completed. Also, people become more responsible and mature in the absence of a specialist to lead their steps.
Finally, another advantage of learning from people at your own level is that this process could be a pleasure as well. Leaning and working with those at the same level of the educational or work hierarchy offers some changes for relaxation. The interaction does not have the rigid character and the formality that would have in case of co-operating with teachers or supervisors. For instance, students who study together and try to fill their knowledge gaps have the flexibility to joke between them and have a dosage of fun.
To sum up, taking into account of all things have been spoken above it could be concluded that learning from people at your own level is not only more productive and also a more joyful process.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 225, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...w pieces of knowledge. But people learn better things from those ones at their own lev...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: THESE_ONES[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'those' instead.
Suggestion: those
...ge. But people learn better things from those ones at their own level of from those at a h...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orting this claim will be discussed. To begin with, dealing and interacting w...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uctivity of learners might increase. Furthermore, it should be mentioned that...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f a specialist to lead their steps. Finally, another advantage of learning f...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, if, so, then, thus, well, for instance, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1943.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 394.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93147208122 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6913380544 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515228426396 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0628722634 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.944444444 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369227272442 0.236089414692 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124097468146 0.076458572812 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131512838637 0.0737576698707 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221253407251 0.150856017488 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0955663331462 0.0645574589148 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.