A person should never make a difficult decision by yourself.
The reading passage and the lecture have conflicting opinions about whether the advance of technology by providing smart cars will bring more positive or negative consequences to the users, drivers, and cities. The article presumes that this new technology created to transportation will give only improvements, since a human would not be in charge of controlling the vehicles. On the other hand, the listening part affirms the opposite. Since technology process also have its fails.
First of all, according to the reading smart cars will prevent accidents, since they will be equiped with sensors that can detect other cars and obstacles on the way. However the lecturer disputes this part. She says that because technology fails all time, many more cars can be involved in a car crash.
Secondly, the reading states that because cars will be controlled by computers, the traffic will disappear. The system will make sure that cars will follow each other closely, increasing the speed on the roads and resulting in less traffic. This feature will also encourage more people to commute, since they would spend less time during their travel.
Nevertheless, the lecturer refutes this argument. She argues that driving with more convenience can actually introduce more cars on the streets, increasing traffic. Therefore, decreasing people interests in commute.
Finally, the reading claims that technology will give less costs in vehicles maintenance by choosing better routes. Also less money will be spent in repairs, since the mechanic system will not get affected by problems like holes and other obstacles on the streets. On the other hand the lecturer believes that the more advanced the equipment the more expensive its repairs. The technology will not help people to save any money.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cting opinions about whether the advance of technology by providing smart cars ...
^^
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g opinions about whether the advance of technology by providing smart cars will...
^^
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bout whether the advance of technology by providing smart cars will bring more ...
^^
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by providing smart cars will bring more positive or negative consequences to the...
^^
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s, and cities. The article presumes that this new technology created to transport...
^^
Line 1, column 444, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...he listening part affirms the opposite. Since technology process also have its fails...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 468, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s the opposite. Since technology process also have its fails. First of all, ac...
^^
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ct other cars and obstacles on the way. However the lecturer disputes this part. She sa...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 22, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in a car crash. Secondly, the reading states that because cars will be control...
^^
Line 7, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ncreasing traffic. Therefore, decreasing people interests in commute. Finally,...
^^
Line 9, column 55, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun costs is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...eading claims that technology will give less costs in vehicles maintenance by choosi...
^^^^
Line 9, column 102, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...sts in vehicles maintenance by choosing better routes. Also less money will be spent i...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 117, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... maintenance by choosing better routes. Also less money will be spent in repairs, si...
^^^^
Line 9, column 310, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he other hand the lecturer believes that the more advanced the equipment the more...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, finally, first, however, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 285.0 407.700716846 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31929824561 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58420516668 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 212.727598566 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540350877193 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.0055430803 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1764705882 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7647058824 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 5.5376344086 253% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.00763624769903 0.236089414692 3% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00279028960698 0.076458572812 4% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0111611584279 0.0737576698707 15% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00472727532462 0.150856017488 3% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00945455064923 0.0645574589148 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.