a person should never take an important decision alone.
At some point or the other, time will come when a person has to make an important decision that can have momenteous ramifications. The prompt suggests that a person should always consult others while taking a concequential decision. I agree with the prompt for the following reasons.
To begin with, there is a famous technique with the name "Wisdom of the crowd" that is used in various fields. One can understand its importance given that it is used in not just one or two fields but in a multitude of fields. One can understand the importance of implementing such a technique while making an important decision as well. The basic supposition of this technique is that the knowledge of a group of people will help in producing a better outcome as compared to the knowledge of any one person in the group. When we present a problem to a group of people, they all will attack the problem from different perspectives. Buying discussing various advantages and disadvantages of each perspective, the group can arrive at a common solution that is least likely to fail. In a similar manner, when a person consults a number of people and take into consideration their opinions, the person will be equipped with the knowledge of those people and will be in a better position to take important decisions than otherwise would have.
Moreover, when a person takes a pivotal decision upon consultation with a group of people, there would people to support him if the decision leads to unanticipated consequences. The support from the people would infact wane the damage and help him in recovering as soon as possible. The person will only emerge from the debacle with more determination and optimism which can have a positive impact taking future decisions. In contrast, if a person takes an important decision on his own and faces adverse consequences, he will be in predicament with no support from his acquaintances or friends. Such a plight would make it harder for him to recuperate.
Therefore, as one can see, it is never advisable to take an important decision alone as knowledge of a group can play a consequential role in taking the right decision as well as one will have the support of a group of people in case the decision leads to an unwelcomed result.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he prompt for the following reasons. To begin with, there is a famous techniq...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 796, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "In a similar manner" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... solution that is least likely to fail. In a similar manner, when a person consults a number of peo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...decisions than otherwise would have. Moreover, when a person takes a pivotal ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ivotal decision upon consultation with a group of people, there would people to s...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ke it harder for him to recuperate. Therefore, as one can see, it is never a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, as to, in contrast, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1887.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 389.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85089974293 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93695696133 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.462724935733 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 603.0 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0062171258 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.9375 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3125 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366740799514 0.236089414692 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11254026291 0.076458572812 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113408606087 0.0737576698707 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255091442145 0.150856017488 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680326481418 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.