Qualities of a good leader
By and large, it is beyond doubt that leadership is a very distinct quality in a person. In this regard, being a good leader is of paramount importance. There has been no shortage of debates among scholars that whether everyone can be a leader or a person being in charge has some definite characteristics. As for the writer's opinion, I subscribe to the idea that a good leader has distinguishable traits which he uses to align the persons in his group. In what follows, I will delve into some crucial qualities of a remarkable leader to substantiate my viewpoint.
The first character of a good leader corroborating my viewpoint is that he should respond to the critical as well as to any situation instantly. It is notable that acting intellectually and fastly creates a remarkable impression on the people. They will understand and be satisfied with their superior's performance. It is worth mentioning that if the leader will not give an instant reaction, it will create chaos in people and a sense of intense worry. Vividly, the mentioned point can only be achieved if the person in charge controls people by responding to the specific situation and by taking measures to save them from trouble. By way of illustration, 10 years ago, I was in Pakistan and the land got hit by an earthquake. Millions of people died and their houses got diminished. My family got really worried about the disaster as we were living close to the affected area. A chief taking control of this current scenario took action and did a press conference instantly. He developed a sense of satisfaction in people to calm themselves and told them about the minor aftershocks of the earthquake which were going to happen a day after. His conference really helped me and my family to get relieved. If he had not responded to the situation well and fast enough, it would have become really difficult for the people to understand the situation. This example clearly illustrates a good quality of a leader.
The second rationale behind by viewpoint is that a better monitor should listen to others. By listening to other people in his team or group he can better understand their problems. Leaders are humans also so by negotiating with the people under their command, they could also identify their own misdoings and get different better ideas. It is crystal clear that this develops a connection between the leaders and the people depending on them. If he will not consider the opinions of others important, it could give him an impression of arrogance. As a case in mind, 5 years ago when I was in university, my teachers voted for me to become a class representative. I became very excited and communicated with my whole class about their troubles and different ways of how should I approach this new responsibility. As a result, my class-fellows became very satisfied and glad that they will get listened to. Had I not talked to them, they would not have felt relaxed to inform their problems with such ease.
By perusing the above paragraphs, one can infer that to be an effective head, leading qualities matters a lot. For the sake of brevity, a couple of traits are worth reiterating: first, a leader should respond instantly, second, he should listen to others. I vehemently urge people to develop some good habits to be a profound chairman. By doing so, the people under the leader's command will be not only be contended but also very efficient.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 319, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...me definite characteristics. As for the writers opinion, I subscribe to the idea that a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, really, second, so, well, as for, as to, as a result, as well as, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 67.0 43.0788530466 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 80.0 52.1666666667 153% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2846.0 1977.66487455 144% => OK
No of words: 591.0 407.700716846 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81556683587 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.93056706295 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86120758715 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 289.0 212.727598566 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489001692047 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 886.5 618.680645161 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 22.0 9.59856630824 229% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.6003584229 150% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9817847751 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8064516129 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.064516129 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22580645161 5.45110844103 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245382881232 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703481373673 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112150765916 0.0737576698707 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190573917617 0.150856017488 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117186994333 0.0645574589148 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 144.0 86.8835125448 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.