Question :Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only.
There has been an approach that learning skills facilitates the daily routine and brings about a convenient life, on the contrary, some individuals contend that specializing in a certain skill is way more crucial. I whole-heartedly agree with this statement that improving varied skills will inevitably result in success compared to people whom concentrate only in a specific skill. This essay will enlarge upon the benefits of learning different skills and glance over the side of the argument as well.
To commence with, the working place has always been a rivalry environment, correspondingly, the staff do their best to get promotions and to receive more money. What is more, the highly skilled people concerning different subjects tend to be more successful compared to the ordinary individuals. An ample example of this situation would be the renowned body builder and actor Arnold Schwarzenegger, who earned millions of dollars in terminator series. Accordingly, he engaged in acting rehearses and entered the world of movies, even he admitted that if he remained only in the bodybuilding arena and did not develop his skills, he would not have earned this wealth.
Moreover, science and technology are advancing with a tremendous pace in this day and age. Meanwhile, staying focused on an individual subject does not guarantee a breakthrough in the development of patents and promising technologies and therefore role of interdisciplinary research reflects its utmost prominence here. A salient example of this situation would be the production of the COVID-19 vaccines in this pandemic era as scientists who are familiar with bioinformatics approaches have a high chance to come up with new solutions regarding the development of vaccines compared to traditional pharmacists whom only rely on experimental procedures.
Turning to the other side of the argument, although the promotion of numerous skills is helpful to reach success, sometimes staying focused on a specific type of skill enables success. To illustrate, the well-known electric guitar player Joe Satriani spent most precious times of his youth concentrating on playing his electric guitar, recording tracks, and playing live concerts due to his passion for this musical instrument. He told the social media that if I did allocate my time to other activities I would have got to this place which I am right now.
By and large, the advancement in several skills is necessary to be more successful in several aspects of our lives, nonetheless, some people argue that the professions have advanced in a great way that one cannot develop several skills and need to be focused on one certain subject. Herein, I reiterate my opinion that by participating in learning different skills, there would be a higher chance to reach success and be proud owing to the aforementioned reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 655, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m only rely on experimental procedures. Turning to the other side of the argumen...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 183, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a great way" with adverb for "great"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...rgue that the professions have advanced in a great way that one cannot develop several skills ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 465, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ud owing to the aforementioned reasons.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, if, moreover, nonetheless, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, by and large, on the contrary, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2402.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 454.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29074889868 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06724052647 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559471365639 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 747.0 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.5922962956 48.9658058833 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.133333333 100.406767564 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2666666667 20.6045352989 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.13333333333 5.45110844103 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296001356403 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949515817606 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837823154317 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157915541273 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640156459127 0.0645574589148 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 11.7677419355 158% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 58.1214874552 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.01818996416 124% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 86.8835125448 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.