Question Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups and all members of the group receive the same grade mark on the project Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a go

Essay topics:

Question :Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups, and all members of the group receive the same grade (mark) on the project. Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to evaluate students?

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words Do not use memorized examples.

Group projects are important parts of the educational system. Students should learn to work in groups Because this skill is going to benefit them in the future. Grading students in group project have always been a dilemma for teachers and professors. Although some experts may believe that everyone should receive the same score in group projects, I think we should evaluate students separately. I think in this way for two reasons which I will explain in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, It is not fair to give every member the same score. Some students work harder in the group. They spend more time and energy progressing the project. On the contrary, some others relax and do nothing and wait for others to do everything. My personal experience is a compelling example. When I was in high school, we had a math project. We divided into five groups, and each group had five members. My friend and I worked very hard and spent a lot of time calculating the problems. But three other members did nothing. They partied when we were working. Finally, we present our project, and the teacher grades all members equally. It wasn't fair for my friend and me.
Furthermore, giving the same score to everyone decreases the group's motivation. Studies have shown that peoples are more motivated when they are going to get evaluated. If everyone grades separately, they work harder to achieve a better score. They find themselves in a competition, and they start to compete with their group members. This is the effect of positive motivation, which leads to group progress. For instance, our chemistry professor always grades students separately in group projects, and he gives the top students in each group one extra point for final exams. Students usually work very hard on his projects. Sometimes, they even publish papers. Scoring each member for his efforts motivates students to work as though as they can, and the result is excellent academic papers and development in science.
In conclusion, scoring everyone in a group the same is not a good idea. Because it is not fair, and the professors should apply justice. Plus, By scoring each person in a group separately, we can motivate them to work harder and reach better results.

Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:


Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 652, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
... teacher grades all members equally. It wasnt fair for my friend and me. Furthermore...
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'groups'' or 'group's'?
Suggestion: groups'; group's
...he same score to everyone decreases the groups motivation. Studies have shown that peo...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, so, for instance, i think, in conclusion, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1867.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 378.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93915343915 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58033627083 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529100529101 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9871977016 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 64.3793103448 100.406767564 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.0344827586 20.6045352989 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44827586207 5.45110844103 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364274040591 0.236089414692 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0953100289755 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753720161069 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227606062466 0.150856017488 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538252709493 0.0645574589148 83% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 11.7677419355 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.48 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.