QUESTION Some people think that human needs for farmland housing and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals Do you agree or disagree with this point of view Why or why not Use specific reasons and examples to support your answ

Essay topics:

Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Earth is home to a number of flora and fauna. Human beings are one among the many species. Due to the more evolved human brain, human beings started developing a sense of superiority and ownership over this beautiful planet. This lead to a massive decline in the other living creatures and keeps getting worse by the second. The prompt says that saving land for farming, housing etc is more important than protecting areas for endangered species. In my opinion, I disagree with this statement due to the following two reasons.

To begin with, all the animals have equal rights of survival on Earth and should be treated that way. Human beings can't neglect these endangered species at the expense of their own greed and hunger. Having areas meant particularly for animals such as national parks would help them to thrive and survive. Amazon is said to be the lungs of the planet as it consists of more than 50% of species of plants and animal present on Earth. Continuous deforestation would have devastating impact not only the animals but also on human beings as an ecosystem that large is a major contributor for the climate in that region. It's important to not plunder the resources from earth and damage the ecosystems at the expense of animals.

To add further, saving land for housing, industry may be a temporary solution as there would be a time when there won't be any forests or land to destroy for the same. Growing population leads to an increased demand thereby affecting the protected parks or natural resources. The lush green forests and lakes around the city of Bengaluru, a city in south India have been reduced to a concrete jungle with sky high buildings. The city continues to destroy it's resources in it's vicinity leading to many unprecedented problems such as water shortage, change in climate as the rains have reduced, etc. These problems will be further aggravated unless relevant action is taken in controlling the population and conserving the environment around the city.

Mother Earth is said to be home for a multitude of living creatures and should be treated the same. Human beings should limit the rate at which they are going about plundering the planet for resources, damaging the planet as well as causing extinction of several species. It's a time bomb which has only picked up the pace in recent years and when the time comes, humans would've destroyed the planet and every living soul in it.

Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:


Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...hould be treated that way. Human beings cant neglect these endangered species at the...
Line 7, column 273, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
... causing extinction of several species. Its a time bomb which has only picked up th...
Line 7, column 371, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: would've
...t years and when the time comes, humans wouldve destroyed the planet and every living s...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, second, so, well, as for, such as, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2021.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 417.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84652278177 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51048099429 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541966426859 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6847515179 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.05 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.85 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173410131117 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550740939846 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601505122881 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11563238831 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062815052271 0.0645574589148 97% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.