smoking
The article states that public smoking causes health risks and provide reasons of support. The professor explains that she is disagree with freedom and refers each of the author's reasons. First, the reading claims that some health problems occur because of secondhand smoke. However, the professor refutes this point by explaining that smokers do not do it home. She states that government can take action about clean environment and air protected. Second, the article posits that smoking ban affects the freedoms and economic positions of business owners and bar and restaurant have had shut down. The professor saying that city and bar new one open and thrives. According to the professor, Smoking at home avoiding and make clear air. Third, the reading says that smokers pay higher tax. The professor opposes that lung cancer and heart diseases this point by explaining that smoking create health disease of lunge cancer and heart disease
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disagreed'.
Suggestion: disagreed
...ort. The professor explains that she is disagree with freedom and refers each of the aut...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 791, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ading says that smokers pay higher tax. The professor opposes that lung cancer a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 15.1003584229 7% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 52.1666666667 23% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 790.0 1977.66487455 40% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 152.0 407.700716846 37% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19736842105 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 4.48103885553 78% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28277149675 2.67179642975 85% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 212.727598566 46% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.638157894737 0.524837075471 122% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 618.680645161 37% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.6003584229 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0315968007 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.0 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.45110844103 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.53405017921 22% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25900879461 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100414908655 0.076458572812 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105026136442 0.0737576698707 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25900879461 0.150856017488 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 86.8835125448 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.