Some people believe that the best way of learning about life is by listening to the advice of family and friends. Other people believe that the best way of learning about life is through personal experience. Compare the advantages of these two different ways of learning about life. Which do you think is preferable? Use specific examples to support your preference.
All people face several problems and situations in their life, and some of them solve them positively but other parts of people not. For figuring their problems out, they should learn how they solve these issues. There could be many methods but two of them are the most effective, one is learning from their family or friends and other is learning with their personal experiences.
First of all, there are so many experienced people in communities environments, these kinds of people have much information about life or any other things such as love, a good friendship, working in a company, etc. Because, they have been faced some problems and bad conditions during their life, and other parts of people may be face in their future life. And, all of them always advice their young members and children, and some less experienced people too.
Also, some of advisable activities would have been solved quickly and perfectly, in these situations people have to make good decision rapidly. The Learning is a process and it could be last long. And, an unexperienced people do not know what they do and they do not enough time for learning personally. For that they need people who tought them.
In addition, in some working areas there are a senior person who manage some projects. And, They would help their junior person in their groups. Then, there are several rules which followed by their all group members. All of these could be strict and their worker have to do them. Although, some of group member have their own abilities they have to listen their leaders advice.
Moreover, the learning process in life should be strong, while people listen their mentor's advice they should concentrate enough. If they not focus harshly their processes would be failure. For reaching a top-level of learning life they should learn own self.
In conlusion, both two learning techniques have their advantages and disadvantages, although the first learning approach is easy the second approach is the best method.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 461, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., and some less experienced people too. Also, some of advisable activities would...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 55, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'people', 'persons'?
Suggestion: people; persons
...n some working areas there are a senior person who manage some projects. And, They wou...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 282, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...trict and their worker have to do them. Although, some of group member have their own ab...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 131, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... advice they should concentrate enough. If they not focus harshly their processes ...
^^
Line 9, column 251, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to own'
Suggestion: to own
...evel of learning life they should learn own self. In conlusion, both two learni...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, second, so, then, while, in addition, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 52.1666666667 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 335.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01791044776 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43323685002 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498507462687 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.0 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.0348537114 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4736842105 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6315789474 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05263157895 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251893962046 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0887844467595 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568445763485 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151712702348 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509563085412 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.