Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The Earth is existed quite ages ago. When people began to live on the Earth, they first just consumed the sources. After a while, they figured out to produce by using the source of the Earth. Nevertheless while life goes on humanity became a risk against the nature of world because of the changes that they’ve done. From my point of view, the Earth absulately is being harmed by human activity. I believe that natural life, sources on the Earth and ozon layer are the biggest evidence to say that.
Initially, it is well established that natural life is being affected by the other’s activity throughout the life of the Earth. In spite of the fact that people tried to be beneficial and producer for the Earth, they actually became a risk factor. Therefore humanity affected the natural life nature. When natural life affected, all the order of life in nature differed from it original. Forests, total amount of water, increased temperature are the factors, which we can determine the harm of humanity to the natural life.
The second point i would like to make is that since it seems like the amount of sources are decreased, the rest of the life of the Earth is also minimized. Humanity, unitentionally, stopped to care about the Earth. Instead of this, they enjoyed to consume its sources. Lack of sources mean the lack of Earth’s life. Therefore i don’t believe that our sons will have enough sources to live after decades.
Finally, and most importantly, ozon layer must be mentioned. From day to day, ozon layer obtains damage. Because of the spent of unnatural products, It isn’t only getting smaller, but it also recieves lack of power to save oxygen contained under it. Moreover harmful gases began to show their harmful effect on the Earth as the ozon layer obtained a damage.
In conlusion, in my opinion the Earth is in danger beacuse of the facts damage in natural life, decreased sources and ozon layer risk. Humanity has to think and figure out the problem that they did. Then, precautionary steps must be done to save the Earth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...oduce by using the source of the Earth. Nevertheless while life goes on humanity became a ri...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...th, they actually became a risk factor. Therefore humanity affected the natural life natu...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 18, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... the natural life. The second point i would like to make is that since it see...
^
Line 5, column 238, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'enjoyed consuming'.
Suggestion: enjoyed consuming
... about the Earth. Instead of this, they enjoyed to consume its sources. Lack of sources mean the l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 322, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ces mean the lack of Earth's life. Therefore i don't believe that our sons will...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 257, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...wer to save oxygen contained under it. Moreover harmful gases began to show their harmf...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 355, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'damage'.
Suggestion: damage
...on the Earth as the ozon layer obtained a damage. In conlusion, in my opinion the Ear...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, then, therefore, well, while, as to, in my opinion, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1729.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 356.0 407.700716846 87% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85674157303 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51603085207 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516853932584 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0715525007 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.1739130435 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4782608696 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08695652174 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226189573669 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746381606948 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527146086106 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135204041222 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589463714149 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => The average readability is low. Need to improve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.