Some people prefer to focus on ambitious dreams while others think realistic goals are more important Which do you prefer and why

Essay topics:

Some people prefer to focus on ambitious dreams while others think realistic goals are more important. Which do you prefer and why?

Everyone has divergent kinds of aimed achievements including abstract and attainable dreams. Individuals need to be meticulous while setting goals because their agenda may heavily influence their overall life. I believe that having achievable objective is beneficial for me. I feel this way for three main reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.

To begin with, individuals can maximize their potential if they know that their purpose is possible. Some people, especially youngsters, have such unreal goals that they will not even endeavor to accomplish their purposes. On the other hand, the majority of individuals have aim that they are likely to carry out successfully, so they will be encouraged to implement these things. As a result, their possibility of succeeding is relatively high. For instance, my friend named Sara has dream of learning every language in the world, which seems impossible for me. Unfortunately, she also agrees with me and does not believe in herself. Consequently, she is doing nothing to accomplish her dream. Conversely, my aim was to study English within a year. I thought I can do it because it did not seem arduous for me. Then, I was stay encouraged because I hoped that my purpose is clear. Therefore, I have accomplished the main part of my purpose. This example demonstrates how people will be incentivized if they have possible aim.

Secondly, they will seem reliable and mature in others’ eyes, which means they can establish adequate relationships with others who may be helpful. Our life is full of correlation with others, so we should be available to make partners to take their support in various means to succeed. Fortunately, people with doable purpose could seem dependable and scrupulous in other individuals' eyes, so they can have fine colleagues. For example, my brother’s dream is to become the richest man in the world within three years. He was aiming to set up business in the local market, and was seeking business partner with whom my sibling can work. Unfortunately, no one wanted to help him because all of them thought my brother is unreliable and do not have basic knowledge. If he had well-founded aim, he would have found companions.

In summation, having possible goals is the essential stepping stone of succeeding. This is because individuals can stay motivated, and others will be willing to work with them.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 377, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ese ideas in the subsequent paragraphs. To begin with, individuals can maximize ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 486, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'dreamed', 'dreamt'.
Suggestion: dreamed; dreamt
... For instance, my friend named Sara has dream of learning every language in the world...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1028, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...incentivized if they have possible aim. Secondly, they will seem reliable and ma...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 825, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed aim, he would have found companions. In summation, having possible goals is t...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, conversely, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, i feel, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2024.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 396.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11111111111 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90828411933 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570707070707 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7411385606 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.96 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.84 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0843651486025 0.236089414692 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0252536555903 0.076458572812 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.028061079186 0.0737576698707 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0546993998313 0.150856017488 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0151632396669 0.0645574589148 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.