some people prefer to go and visit the tourist attractions where there are many people. others like the ones with fewer people. which one do you prefer?
Nowadays with its galloping rate of progress, people are working without stop in order to fulfill their livelihood requirments. It is ctystal clear that they are in great need of leisure, fun and trips. The first indication of selecting a destination for a journy is its tourist attractions. Opinions are devided as to whether people prefers tourist attractions with less people while others are against this idea. Despite the fact that places which are much more quite might be more convinient, it is my firm conviction that locations buslting with people are more convincing. In what follows, I will elaborate on my perspective.
The first vital point to bear in mind is that the more people visiting a place the more interesting the place could be. This logic is even practical when someone is looking for a restaurant, clearly, those crowded with people have higher quility of food and service. The number of visitors in a tourist attraction show how popular is the place. What is more, accessibilty of a tourist place is of great importance, wherever there is a host of people in it, shows that it is near public tranportation and people can access readily.
Another worthwile reason to be mentioned is that social communication will be possible in such places full of people from different countries with different nations and cultures. Not only you can hear their notions of the place and disscus, but also you may find friends and extend your relationships. Take my personal experiance as a compelling example; last year as a part of my trip to Turkey I have visited Ayasofia mosque which is a famous tourist attraction in Istanbul city. This place is always full of people from different countries and cultures. I have met a couple from Iraq and I explored the whole building accompanying them. Sharing information and talking about our opinions made us friend at the end and we still have contanct.
To wrap up it is a foregone conclusion that crowded tourist attractions are better choices to visit. The fact that famous places are fundamentally the most notable ones to observe , coupled with the fact that in those crowded and popular locations it is possible to get to know people of various cultures, is the reason which strenghten my claim.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 314, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...urist attractions. Opinions are devided as to whether people prefers tourist attractions with...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 368, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...people prefers tourist attractions with less people while others are against this id...
^^^^
Line 4, column 180, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...entally the most notable ones to observe , coupled with the fact that in those cro...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, so, still, while, as to, talking about, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 15.1003584229 192% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1877.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91361256545 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75593125841 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541884816754 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7060976739 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.277777778 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72222222222 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300828122561 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870216358735 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816143072426 0.0737576698707 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185953017654 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475902255481 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.