Some people prefer to work for large company. Others prefer to work for small company. Which would you prefer?
To begin with, there are more close relationship between employees in small company. One of the most merits of small company is that there is not management hierarchy, therefore, employees have friendly relationship with other employees and managers and can talk with them. Since employee has access to their managers they can share their idea about developing products or even applying new policy for future sale. On the other hand, managers can understand employees’ problems such as financial issues, health, phycology problem, etc. and try to find suitable solution for them. For instance, two years ago, I was working for a company where there were just ten employees. I had a financially problem on that time because I bought a house and spend all of my money for that. One day my manager saw me and immediately realized I have problem, and asked me about this. When I shared this problem with my manger he offered me to loan from company to solve this issues.
Furthermore, employee can progress much more easily in small companies. As employees are optimistic about prosperity they work harder and try to increase their efficiency. Thus, their share price in stock market or generally, the company’s value will increase. According to the new researches which was published by Michigan business institution (MBI), small companies were more profitable and developed sharply in compare to big company such as Google, Microsoft, and Apple. Subsequently, employees earned more money and had better life.
Some people prefer to work for large and famous company. Others, however, prefer to work for small company with a few number of employees. As I concerned, I prefer second attitude. This essay will support my idea by providing some reasons in following paragraphs.
To sum up, from what I have discussed above, we can safely drew a conclusion that working for small company can benefit more. I indicated it by presented reasons and self-experience in this essay.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 686, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('financially') instead an adjective, or a noun ('problem') instead of another adjective.
...re there were just ten employees. I had a financially problem on that time because I bought a house a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 874, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... have problem, and asked me about this. When I shared this problem with my manger he...
^^^^
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'few numbers'.
Suggestion: few numbers
...prefer to work for small company with a few number of employees. As I concerned, I prefer ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 60, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'draw'
Suggestion: draw
...t I have discussed above, we can safely drew a conclusion that working for small com...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, for instance, such as, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 323.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13931888545 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8178783545 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585139318885 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4345083629 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.15 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265500611583 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0969494701574 0.076458572812 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154091625679 0.0737576698707 209% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197128481313 0.150856017488 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.184061040185 0.0645574589148 285% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.