Some people like to travel with a companion. Other people prefer to travel alone. Which do you prefer?
There are two attitudes about traveling; some people prefer to travel alone, while others prefer to travel with friends. Travel with friends has demerit like following group which limit our freedom, but it has some advantages such as financial benefit and safeness. In my point of view, I prefer to travel with friends. This essay will provide some reasons to support my idea as follows.
First of all, traveling with friend is much more interesting than traveling alone. Since we have someone to talk and share our feelings with them during journey which leads to fun. In addition, traveling with friends or caravan make trip safer. Because sometimes we need to rest, or have a camp out of city in desert or jungles, which there are a lot of different wild and lethal animals, so it is better to have someone to ask help in hazardous situation. Five years ago, for instance, I had travel to desert with my friend. Our car was broken suddenly and we tent in the desert mandatorily until sun rising. At the night, a snake, Cobra, bitted my feet. I screamed and my friends realized issue fast and helped me. Fortunately one of them was doctor and cured me easily. Without them undoubtedly I would die in the desert.
Furthermore, traveling need much money and it need to have financial management during travel. One of the most benefits of traveling with friends is that we can save money by dividing the travel cost between members, therefore we can save money. Moreover, in this way we can share our properties and also divide duties. Another advantage of traveling with friends is that we will know each other better and it helps to cement the relationships.
In conclusion, personally, I prefer to go journey with my friends. I presented some reasons and indicated some advantages of this kind of travel in previous paragraphs.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 316.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80696202532 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56185105664 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556962025316 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7164278885 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.95 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.95 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361873690036 0.236089414692 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112619444711 0.076458572812 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128663806294 0.0737576698707 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249357211291 0.150856017488 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142193325371 0.0645574589148 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 11.7677419355 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.