Some people say that the internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
By the invention of Internet in our era, Living have gotten easier than what used to be. Some theoreticians believe that a multitude information, which Internet is caring, is exceeded. On the other hand, some other ideologists stand on the other side and believe that that information provide difficulties. I agree with former claim and believe that given data from internet are valuable because of two reason that I will explore in the following paragraphs.
First, Huge flood of information in the Internet is associated with comfort that makes our life so easy. The comfortable life stem from reducing time and energy owing to all information given by Internet. In the other word, we can use feasibility of it when there is no need to either go bank and pay your bill or travel to your mom's state and visit her. By using your computer and a good connection doing all of them is as easy as drinking a glass water. To settle my assumption for good I can give an example of our past difficulty when individuals had to commute to and from banks, every day for pay bills and check their deposit on their bank account and so on. This is so explicit when it comes to manage an individual's business. Transaction will be very easy, as a businessperson just needs to sit behind his or her computer and work from home. Rendering people's difficulties ending to consume time and energy cultivates seed of satisfaction and contentment between all members of society. Thanks to Internet, there is no accuse and misrepresentation about tiredness of working.
Second, Internet with lots of information containing improve intellectual ability of individuals. Today, people can find any information on Internet besides all traditional source that they have been having so far. Finding answer of all questions provides a kind of home schooling that all people can improve their information in the wide variety of science. For instance, in the past, people who was inclined to learn more had to go to different institute and visit several academics to find knowledge. As a result, most of them got disappointment and gave up totally. This hard way of learning lagged behind people in the last era. On the other hand, today, Internet unfolds all obstacles of education, and there is no discriminant in the road of knowledge. Had people got access to internet, they would have improved their rational ability and increased literacy in society.
In conclusion, worth full information of Internet introduced our life to cozy situation which not only can people do every duties fast and comfortable, but they also can enhance literacy and knowledge in their society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 442, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'glass water'.
Suggestion: glass water
...oing all of them is as easy as drinking a glass water. To settle my assumption for good I can...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, second, so, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2212.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 445.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97078651685 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86282256898 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54606741573 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 708.3 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5088911429 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.545454545 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2272727273 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.04545454545 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271093728931 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739325131039 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487634089375 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16194918746 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532316689876 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.