Some people suggest that it is wrong to give money to beggars asking for money on the street, while others think that it is the right thing to do. Which point of view do you think is correct, and why?
Although many countries have experienced economic growth in the past decades, poverty is still a prevalent problem. Some people feel that helping and supporting the poor involves giving away few coins to people on the streets. Personally, I believe that it is not right to give money to people begging for it on the streets. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, giving money to beggars only help them momentarily and does not solve their core problems. When you give money to someone you are not truly supporting them as they will likely keep relying on other people to help them instead of finding a solution to their financial problems. For example, in my country many people with few economic resources even rely entirely on their children on begging for money on the streets. The money they get from begging only provides them short-term support. There are many news reports that show how many parents from low economic backgrounds would not even try to find a job since they think that forcing their young children to beg for money is enough to sustain the family. Therefore, giving money does not solve their problem and does not decreases poverty. In order to permanently leave poverty and improve their quality of life, people must learn a way to make a living by doing honest work that ensures constant monthly income for their families.
Furthermore, there is no guarantee that the money they will get will be spend on the right things. While some beggars would use it to buy food, people can also use the money to consume harmful substances like alcohol or cigarettes. For example, when I was a child, there was a homeless person who would often come to our family business to ask for some money. At the beginning, my mother would let them some but after a while we found out that the homeless person was using the money not to buy food, but to consume alcohol and drugs. Giving money does not necessarily help them. If you want to help someone in need, it is better to provide support in other ways such as giving them food or clothes so they are able to satisfy their basic needs first. A better option would be to donate things to charity that help people in need.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that is not morally right to give money to beggars. It does not solve the problem of poverty and they might use it for the wrong purposes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 515, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...ides them short-term support. There are many news reports that show how many parents...
^^^^
Line 3, column 515, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun news seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much news', 'a good deal of news'.
Suggestion: much news; a good deal of news
...ides them short-term support. There are many news reports that show how many parents from...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 790, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'decrease'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: decrease
...es not solve their problem and does not decreases poverty. In order to permanently leave ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 790, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'decrease'
Suggestion: decrease
...es not solve their problem and does not decreases poverty. In order to permanently leave ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, still, therefore, while, for example, i feel, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1993.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 431.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62412993039 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28875697544 2.67179642975 86% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487238979118 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 614.7 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5526069506 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.65 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.55 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305362702404 0.236089414692 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0975864531762 0.076458572812 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046887438423 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181827876563 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250720586531 0.0645574589148 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.