Some people think that can learn better by themselves than with a teacher. Others think that it is
always better to have a teacher. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and develop your essay
Walking in the way for the first time may shower with unexpected hurdles, in return to overcome this pullback one will find the way to resolve the discrepancy in the tedious fashion. As because unfamiliarity of the path and it's challenging, one solution for this tedious task is encountering the task with the person who is familiar with the path, which the experience. Hence if we want to learn anything in this realm better to learn with the teacher than themselves, despite you will confront with the above scenario.
Firstly, for example, the maths problem is very tedious to solve unless and until it is explained by the teacher. So in this type of scenarios, if you prepare for yourselves then definitely you will end up with the perfect solution but you may get this solution in a day or two, it looks like time-consuming. Hence at this point if time with the teacher you can find the solution faster so that you can utilise the same time indulging with more variety.
Secondly, science is a vast topic where you cannot find the threshold of it. When you start reading these sorts of the subject, you will be baffled in winding the topic. In this critical situation, teachers are the better solutions so that they will be aware of the depth of the topic and also knowledgable to understand the syllabus confinement. As every person is capable to understand this situation but it is time-consuming.
Furthermore, perennially many students will get trained under one teacher, this implies that teachers are well informed when it comes to the career, jobs or future with these experiences. For example, after mechanical bachelors, if a person is tantalizing in opting the master course he/she can take decisions by discussing with their lecturers as because lecturers have seen many students I.e, seniors, so they can suggest you better than anybody.
Therefore, there are many instances with self-work and succession, but it cannot be generalized because a substantial part of our community may not be capable of taking the right decision at the right time. So by quoting the above examples In my perspective learning with the teachers are having more benefit than themselves
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 371, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ar with the path, which the experience. Hence if we want to learn anything in this re...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 27, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'maths'' or 'math's'?
Suggestion: maths'; math's
...scenario. Firstly, for example, the maths problem is very tedious to solve unless...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 310, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...y or two, it looks like time-consuming. Hence at this point if time with the teacher ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 455, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... same time indulging with more variety. Secondly, science is a vast topic where ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1825.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 368.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95923913043 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7693923889 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516304347826 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.6509576733 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.357142857 100.406767564 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2857142857 20.6045352989 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 5.45110844103 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219505140552 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860218619801 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688640775377 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132073407701 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277114855244 0.0645574589148 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.