Some people think governments should spend as much money as possible exploring outer space (for example, traveling to the Moon and to other planets). Other people disagree and think governments should spend this money for our basic needs on Earth. Which of these two opinions do you agree with? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
Overall, it is a widely supported controversy about whether governments should spend a large sum of money on the exploration of the outer space or not. Some people believe that governments should spend this amount of money to fulfill the basic needs of the humans of earth. Although the world has lots of rooms for improvements where the governments should come forward to solve with a big fund, the research on the outer space can bring the solutions to many issues of the earth. A deep study on the space can give us the knowledge on climate change, a smarter way of communication and storing information, some new sources of energy and waters. So, my next sentences will bolster the governments to propel such explorations.
First and foremost, satellite to space settlement is the best achievement of the planetary studies. these satellites are helping in the pervasive ways, for instance, they are storing information, telecasting the important programs from the one end to another by the radio wave. In addition, space satellites can protect us from different types of crimes such as if a country plan to explode the nuclear bombs, we can be informed by taking closer images. Moreover, some space satellites explore the alternative place for lives where water, energy, and plants are available so that we can accommodate the large population to other planets. They send off the pictures of the asteroids and the meteorites around the solar systems thus scientists can analyze these elements whether they can supply energy or not.
Secondly, the studies on outer space are very crucial for learning about the conditions of the climate. We can predict different types of disasters as well as weather conditions by deep analysis of the solar system. Alongside the climate change information, these spatial explorations will offer the jobs for the astrophysicist, scientists, mathematicians. As a result, a new scope of working will be created.
In contrast, it true that there many scopes for the improvements of the basic needs of human on earth. Many people are barely getting health safety, nourishment, clothes, educations etc, but focusing on the only one sides will not outweigh the future problems. Governments should, of course, look after the people so that they can lead a healthy life and should spend the allotted money. Besides, governments must have to manage the expenditure for the outer space exploration, otherwise, the nation will have to be submissive to the powerful countries who will invade us with their satellite power.
In essence, the aforesaid reasons show that planetary studies along the space can change the destiny of the future world. Considering both necessities of outer space exploration and basic needs of human, I will always inspire the governments to allot money for this research fields because it can bring light for the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 101, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...t achievement of the planetary studies. these satellites are helping in the pervasive...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 17, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'trues'?
Suggestion: trues
...ng will be created. In contrast, it true that there many scopes for the improvem...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for instance, in addition, in contrast, of course, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 9.8082437276 245% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2416.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 470.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14042553191 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81057306607 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517021276596 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 754.2 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1004640346 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.8 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320285527771 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101562853556 0.076458572812 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109442248531 0.0737576698707 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190187472338 0.150856017488 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109068750108 0.0645574589148 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.