Some people think governments should spend as much money as possible exploring outer space (for example, traveling to the Moon and to other planets). Other people disagree and think governments should spend this money for our basic needs on Earth. Which of these two opinions do you agree with? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer..
Governments can play an essential role in the society. Some groups of people believe that the government should spend money on developing the travel to other planets. However, the other groups may take the opposite side. From my vantage point, I firmly believe that the governments must satisfy their people basic desires. In the following pragraphs, I will elaborate on my viewpoint through three reasons among the countless ones.
To begin with, people of a country must consider a priority of the governments. We vote for governers to improve our life quality and help us have a prosperous career. Unless we do not possess such a life, the governmet will not accomplish its natural duty, which is satisying the basic needs of people. I can agree that exploring other planets will be beneficial for the science and the people themselves, but as long as people are hungry and require better condition, the government should pay more attention to these matters.
Moreover, when the government are able to provide a high quality life for its citizens, the people and scientist will advance the technology. When people are sure that they do not need to worry about their life and expense, they will contribute their knowledge and experience to traveling outer space. I always remember what my father said to me: A man who is hungery can not hold his religon. It means that when people feel that they cannot support their families, they do not think about the development of their superior desires.
In addition, in many coutries such as third world countries, the government do not have the proper means to provide the basic needs of its people. The wealthy geverments should spend their money in order to help these country to improve the condition of people, instead of funding spaceship projects. Millions and millions of people are living in the worst condition in africa and asia, just because their gevernments are not able to control the situation. Every year althouristics and people who care about other human beings, gather money to eliminate the poverty in these countries.
In conclusion, gevernment should pay more attention to people rudimentary needs rather that spend it on expliting the space. These essential helps not only can improve the life style and development of thechnology, but also will help poor people in other countries to have a flourishing life.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, third, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1988.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 395.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03291139241 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62074354856 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508860759494 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6265336382 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.631578947 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7894736842 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26315789474 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352726794586 0.236089414692 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105342723228 0.076458572812 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0930473806558 0.0737576698707 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195116041592 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511480620647 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.