Many parts of the world are losing important natural resources, such as forests, animals, or clean water. Choose one resource that is disappearing and explain why it needs to be saved. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
Forests play a crucial role in our planet earth. Some groups of people hold the idea that it is more important for human to progress than protect the forests and jungles. However, the other group may take the opposite point. From my vantage point, I firmly believe that saving the forests must be the priority of people and governments. In the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on this subject by discussing three essential reasons among countless ones.
The most crucial reason for holding such an idea is that the forests are the lung of earth. They produce oxygen, the most essential substance for the survival of human being, by absorbing co2 and sunlight as well as water and combining them under a unique procedure. By jogging and cutting trees and destroying forests, we are disrupting this process. In the past, we did not need to worry about the amount of co2 Because there was no source of pollution on earth. But now, regardless of all planting and growing trees in the remote areas by governments and preservationists and the presence of vegetarian cover in the cities and suburbs, we are producing a large amount of co2 by burning fossil fuels. Engines and cars, as well as factories, are the main source of co2 in the earth and not only we do not stop them but also by advancing technology we are enhancing our developments of industries.
Moreover, forests are the habitats of millions of different species of animals and insects. By destroying the forest, not only we are blemishing their home, but also we are disrupting the flora and fauna chains. Each species have created for one specific reason. They are whether the predators or the preys. What happened in my country can be an appropriate example for elaborating on this reason. The northern part of my country is greener than the south region. In this part, people spend their life depending on agriculture and livestock. A few years ago, they found out the wild pig population was in rapid increase. It could endanger their crops and domesticated animals. As a result, they decided to hunt these lovely animals. In fact, it was impossible because they lived in deep and bushy forests, and finding them was not an easy task. Consequently, they start destroying forests, with the purpose of finding them more convenient. They could hunt wild pigs those days, but what they did not realize was they had abolished the whole ecosystem. The consequences are now observable. The forest never grows again, and enormous annual floods create unwanted damage to their buildings and cities.
In conclusion, forests not only can help the human being to breathe healthier but also help animals to have a natural life on the earth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: EACH_EVERY_NNS[1]
Message: 'Each' and 'every' are used with singular. Did you mean 'all'?
Suggestion: All
... disrupting the flora and fauna chains. Each species have created for one specific r...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 13.8261648746 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2242.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 460.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87391304348 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62120551207 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534782608696 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 682.2 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.2259613872 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.037037037 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.037037037 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07407407407 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0900808912547 0.236089414692 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0249673424602 0.076458572812 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0281784514859 0.0737576698707 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0503200320626 0.150856017488 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0154960403077 0.0645574589148 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.