Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
This is a very debatable topic. We would need to look at the pros and the cons of this question and then draw conclusions. Even then it would not be possible to totally the same answer. It would depend on individual personalities and emotional concerns as well as the situation we are in. I would like to further illustrate my points of view in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, we have to know the importance of animals and land, so we can save them more and more in the past. These days because of building houses and some factories people cut jungles, but they do not know some animals live in there. After cutting trees of the jungle, we destroy the ecosystem of there. Therefore, animals which live there immigrate other places for gaining food and home. For example, Panda beers eat bamboo, and people cut the bamboos for selling or making farmland, in spite of the fact that pandas immigrate to other places.
These kinds of activities not only harm for animals but also harm for humankind, because cutting trees cause some problems such as air pollution, global warming, etc.
The end word, we need animals and land, but they do not need humankind.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, look, so, then, therefore, well, for example, such as, as well as, in spite of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 15.1003584229 20% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 52.1666666667 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 1977.66487455 49% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 206.0 407.700716846 51% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66990291262 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 4.48103885553 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41899589589 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 212.727598566 59% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611650485437 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 618.680645161 48% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2644453721 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.1666666667 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1666666667 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.45110844103 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193350122818 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627238595012 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400333927742 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106370201085 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351051809674 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 86.8835125448 46% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.