Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Although there are enough lands for the living of human being, a large number of people are keenly interested in increasing the lands for agricultural activities, residence building, and industrializations. Despite the population has boomed and cities need to be growth, I'm of opinion that we have a huge amount of lands for cultivation, living, and to name a few. Also, keeping land for the animals who are going to the extinction has a great significance. My next sentences will explore the reasons of my disagreement with the thinking of those people.
First and foremost, a closer look at the existing lands for the use of human being shows that there are many lands which have less implementation. Every year lots of farming lands are going to the under water due to the lack of embankments around the rivers. Village people are migrated to the cities in order to change their destiny, but they cannot afford the highly paid residence of the cities. As a result, the population in the slum is increasing day by day. These slums are extending without any planning and it results in the wasting of lands. In addition, farmers are losing interest in seasonal crops, and it consequents the loss of fertility of lands.
Furthermore, population growth is a threat for the future climate of earth beacuase these people are cutting tress, haunting animals. Moreover, due to the deforestation, endangered species are losing their existence. It is affecting our ecological balances, global warming is rising as a big threat. Polar ice will start to melt if these happenings cannot be prevented from. The food chain will be hampered due to the ecological imbalance.
The aforesaid reasons actually show that farming land is barely used by the planners and there is no way of losing lands of the animals. If the government take some step to overcome these problems, there will be a good solution. Governments should imply urban planners to design the cities landscape. Likewise, they should provide cheap residence to the labors, training to the farmers, then we can preserve the farming lands.
In essence the aforesaid reasons always inspire me to oppose the use of animal's land. Rather we should properly use the existing lands.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 64, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...gh lands for the living of human being, a large number of people are keenly interested in increas...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 272, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...as boomed and cities need to be growth, Im of opinion that we have a huge amount o...
^^
Line 9, column 87, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...e me to oppose the use of animals land. Rather we should properly use the existing lan...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, if, likewise, look, moreover, so, then, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1865.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 372.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01344086022 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7885493257 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548387096774 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9979468696 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8095238095 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7142857143 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176967802318 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045423925135 0.076458572812 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490529283453 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0959414427847 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496272726622 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.